Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 14:58:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 14:58:49 -0500 Received: from traven.uol.com.br ([200.231.206.184]:4857 "EHLO traven.uol.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 14:58:36 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 17:57:41 -0200 From: Pablo Borges To: Helge Hafting Cc: war@starband.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4.16 & Heavy I/O Message-Id: <20011205175741.124caeff.pablo.borges@uol.com.br> In-Reply-To: <3C0790A4.4009C357@idb.hist.no> In-Reply-To: <3C0790A4.4009C357@idb.hist.no> Organization: UOL Inc X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.5claws17 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:59:00 +0100 Helge Hafting wrote: > Absolutely all free memory may be used for disk caching. So > no, you can't get a bigger cache because it is already at > the highest possible setting. You don't have more memory > for this - all is used already. May I limit this memory ? For a long time I'm working all day with no physical memory available. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Pablo Borges pablo.borges@uol.com.br ------------------------------------------------------------------- ____ Tecnologia UOL / \ Debian: | =_/ The 100% suck free linux distro. \ \ SETI is lame. http://www.distributed.net Dnetc is XNUG! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/