Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp1813781rwi; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:13:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6IuNo9v43y3TngjU/6Y0GwrAG38pxRJ8MorS7KG9GzOE9WaBIwYAjl/nCw0qrCDK1ZcRmY X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:410:b0:451:ea13:4ed7 with SMTP id q16-20020a056402041000b00451ea134ed7mr22374340edv.262.1665472380529; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:13:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1665472380; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rqYAlelO5rrxeWCb5/zdTDZazfHu9CsPd+NCqt00XV1jFcm/KDeM/ENUWNPdVh6yAC TIjw2L6k2uqn3EwckUBxGqkTSCwNY0mSsLB80REY9ubdzAXMj2GZXy1y6H9INlcqCmGU Y2gaXHiLPYGpBrlTmp4n7p2g8YFzxdiuS1kTMoautV2fpXPc8vxbnM81VO8O1zWEpvJ7 gluNMjJ/2y4t51qghD9Rj50KYve3G0+oRXLJ/W54DWjxfMzn/pU8/oBkk0DjY2CFzS5w 4Tvw1tIJIaciMZi5Co1YMeWDLqcHHHbCdGqt0SL/cfaRK/w+bA4kDP7RGqBVZdywXQRt gZWA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=9oi6Cq+hzFzy3/JewRZeljWs2KJZrXMq1bs08sFiWw0=; b=CuUuxcswcRxx0tGfhP8rL2ehTehsMTyYIhhQucfuxoqDYVFKPL62lg6FdE+nvQgJTC OWExp77TkCzBNtg8HJybp4ld2dG/mVHH/3LPr513nn2u+9wmFzA4nQjCzKgyRgtyF6yr KoTiwf+2Au55J18KW3I11l0tJnvm78rrERSxAQw1Bmy4AqtutopIMZt/NL1EmCzP6Fem Me2mShoIFsWEcUlnhsfDVXv4rXyCHWjrqH4ouqEjefKai804er+rENZ9tC91Njt9fHh+ h4Bqn+NIxPealVBVJIqnLeHhm2b1PNluQGg6SP22OOMuWyyX27Maqc2b7LKy9ICoPfT8 9gUA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=hLkZ9tds; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n22-20020aa7d056000000b00456b734ceebsi11409479edo.436.2022.10.11.00.12.35; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=hLkZ9tds; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229909AbiJKGWO (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 02:22:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51990 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229905AbiJKGVp (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 02:21:45 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C39A8760DA for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 23:21:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1665469290; x=1697005290; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0qxV4gyJ/ejlW/tPGTWrK8Ih4YPly+7yJn9Z1PGkJMw=; b=hLkZ9tdstUoXucqVo7lHgfjQPkEuVMQ7UoRs+2IcyRgHpdsmd6xjIhIv 6Zqd/FT/8DFj4xSgf/qVnA/LcoYcmsRjpYZBbZsKTdXr+feL+6j76JNVN rUy5/y1giLUMStrIyfbYThjBk7dVlz2YSssm3LAgSFLzmWx85+AZ81BBO zgdctNa8paGmHFnjF/TSRq9awDxhjOM3g4mNR5rK5RN3ZXUOEl3IWbeJb fEg3aKvqvMc+HHBtVryk+OSFX6jftsY8IUNRwIQaFLVoyPAD0fzsSXIda U9cNU74YSyhCfkD0juSqCz9NwJDF0JB/m6+hRRT3HtNtiOEeD7FqcpOhy Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10496"; a="284149486" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,175,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="284149486" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Oct 2022 23:21:16 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10496"; a="577321977" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,175,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="577321977" Received: from q.bj.intel.com ([10.238.154.102]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2022 23:21:14 -0700 From: shaoqin.huang@intel.com To: rppt@kernel.org Cc: Shaoqin Huang , Rebecca Mckeever , Karolina Drobnik , David Hildenbrand , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] memblock test: Add test to memblock_add() 129th region Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 14:21:20 +0800 Message-Id: <20221011062128.49359-2-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20221011062128.49359-1-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> References: <20221011062128.49359-1-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Shaoqin Huang Add 129th region into the memblock, and this will trigger the memblock_double_array() function, this needs valid memory regions. So using dummy_physical_memory_init() to allocate a large enough memory region, and split it into a large enough memory which can be choosed by memblock_double_array(), and the left memory will be split into small memory region, and add them into the memblock. It make sure the memblock_double_array() will always choose the valid memory region that is allocated by the dummy_physical_memory_init(). So memblock_double_array() must success. Another thing should be done is to restore the memory.regions after memblock_double_array(), due to now the memory.regions is pointing to a memory region allocated by dummy_physical_memory_init(). And it will affect the subsequent tests if we don't restore the memory region. So simply record the origin region, and restore it after the test. Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang --- tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c | 7 +- tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h | 6 +- 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c index a13a57ba0815..4d61a4b474be 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c @@ -423,6 +423,98 @@ static int memblock_add_near_max_check(void) return 0; } +/* + * A test that trying to add the 129th memory block. + * Expect to trigger memblock_double_array() to double the + * memblock.memory.max, find a new valid memory as + * memory.regions. + */ +static int memblock_add_many_check(void) +{ + int i; + void *orig_region; + struct region r = { + .base = SZ_16K, + .size = SZ_16K, + }; + phys_addr_t new_memory_regions_size; + phys_addr_t base, size = SZ_64; + phys_addr_t gap_size = SZ_64; + + PREFIX_PUSH(); + + reset_memblock_regions(); + memblock_allow_resize(); + + dummy_physical_memory_init(); + /* + * We allocated enough memory by using dummy_physical_memory_init(), and + * split it into small block. First we split a large enough memory block + * as the memory region which will be choosed by memblock_double_array(). + */ + base = PAGE_ALIGN(dummy_physical_memory_base()); + new_memory_regions_size = PAGE_ALIGN(INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2 * + sizeof(struct memblock_region)); + memblock_add(base, new_memory_regions_size); + + /* This is the base of small memory block. */ + base += new_memory_regions_size + gap_size; + + orig_region = memblock.memory.regions; + + for (i = 0; i < INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS; i++) { + /* + * Add these small block to fulfill the memblock. We keep a + * gap between the nearby memory to avoid being merged. + */ + memblock_add(base, size); + base += size + gap_size; + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, i + 2); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, new_memory_regions_size + + (i + 1) * size); + } + + /* + * At there, memblock_double_array() has been succeed, check if it + * update the memory.max. + */ + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.max, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2); + + /* memblock_double_array() will reserve the memory it used. Check it. */ + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, new_memory_regions_size); + + /* + * Now memblock_double_array() works fine. Let's check after the + * double_array(), the memblock_add() still works as normal. + */ + memblock_add(r.base, r.size); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.regions[0].base, r.base); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.regions[0].size, r.size); + + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 2); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * size + + new_memory_regions_size + + r.size); + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.max, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2); + + dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(); + + /* + * The current memory.regions is occupying a range of memory that + * allocated from dummy_physical_memory_init(). After free the memory, + * we must not use it. So restore the origin memory region to make sure + * the tests can run as normal and not affected by the double array. + */ + memblock.memory.regions = orig_region; + memblock.memory.cnt = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS; + + test_pass_pop(); + + return 0; +} + static int memblock_add_checks(void) { prefix_reset(); @@ -438,6 +530,7 @@ static int memblock_add_checks(void) memblock_add_twice_check(); memblock_add_between_check(); memblock_add_near_max_check(); + memblock_add_many_check(); prefix_pop(); diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c index 3f795047bbe1..f43b6f414983 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c @@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ #include #include -#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS 128 -#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS #define PREFIXES_MAX 15 #define DELIM ": " #define BASIS 10000 @@ -115,6 +113,11 @@ void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(void) free(memory_block.base); } +phys_addr_t dummy_physical_memory_base(void) +{ + return (phys_addr_t)memory_block.base; +} + static void usage(const char *prog) { BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(help_opts) != ARRAY_SIZE(long_opts) - 1); diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h index d6bbbe63bfc3..cc82b85151b6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h @@ -10,9 +10,12 @@ #include #include <../selftests/kselftest.h> -#define MEM_SIZE SZ_16K +#define MEM_SIZE SZ_32K #define NUMA_NODES 8 +#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS 128 +#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + enum test_flags { /* No special request. */ TEST_F_NONE = 0x0, @@ -124,6 +127,7 @@ void setup_memblock(void); void setup_numa_memblock(const unsigned int node_fracs[]); void dummy_physical_memory_init(void); void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(void); +phys_addr_t dummy_physical_memory_base(void); void parse_args(int argc, char **argv); void test_fail(void); -- 2.34.1