Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp1862571rwi; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 01:08:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7NKldbLPYi02qelmg0cqVH7pjsQmspEZQqCRLGQAUcwyqKJQ3+6+A8vDp6WdNf7b9PXg8b X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:a8f:b0:563:3a3f:9d5c with SMTP id b15-20020a056a000a8f00b005633a3f9d5cmr11991145pfl.50.1665475705773; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 01:08:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1665475705; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GLH2xHpKC2AdVDHGtD1bmSpYbLBUmvvF/7OoRXpguMgs2qOhLMN/d9kiG+UCz8KaUr dPu668UHXGb02aicaLcZNH7DP/iuu/mJsq6DEsHu+NKJi0ZhCOHWW/onHYOQRLsHWt1/ KWdknT20o8E+6o115xJJ2VBQ4xj6sQPQLtSEvY/sIprPDpVEUp29kDk63/fu0wqAIkc8 FYxPXSMjLlGFRMSL9xpLgVI8OXoJSu3ahXtmgzf2zLdK7n03Ii/QG4V7rK2d0kifYDiq 1o2r5I4nI0t6ne3ZNI+/ozkYfVZNnpDuwMg5NVRYKVxXBFYCTJF7ku8fIG7gViyohdap ok1g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=NSLI6WkuZw1ol0fA4xEU+NR5Q81nG/XRI2xY8kkKCoY=; b=YcVa8QM7iSsJdOGOrBBOFkDlDO0UuFz6aet4twKScoRVNKqFZoMj7w5IU8h9YNcdqB yMjCb9C4K83ngMaHKSIKmhLiVzkiQTwx05R2/wEw5ekbr+M5jHNkXdXJVKskuziNeHYU i4gLEDixbbgtIBVZvBbriEBiqRLESw3CVZoBhr15XRRLFp/xChYeL4G32QkImkcAtkQK INktqxC3291UbEDj719BKY1+7+R5OVbGs6/UMpln2nJf39AOlczxk/bM1A/R9EnDOj01 bkT+ZSHMhHTn+AxLKj3hRAMIYCAi7XbT3TptqxyAx43BEmpqwdtgsJWyGnbXHLuPCZ3O pMbA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bf11-20020a170902b90b00b001743c571718si13543582plb.177.2022.10.11.01.08.14; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 01:08:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229840AbiJKHxg (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 03:53:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56018 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229508AbiJKHxe (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 03:53:34 -0400 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C38089937; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MmnzV6CGMzl43H; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 15:51:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.176.73] (unknown [10.174.176.73]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgAHB8n5IEVjptVhAA--.24519S3; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 15:53:30 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] blk-cgroup: Add NULL check of pd_alloc_fn in blkcg_activate_policy To: Tejun Heo , Kemeng Shi Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "yukuai (C)" References: <20221010023859.11896-1-shikemeng@huawei.com> <20221010023859.11896-4-shikemeng@huawei.com> From: Yu Kuai Message-ID: <8de2f8d1-f3ec-4d93-f7e8-403d609ae9e7@huaweicloud.com> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 15:53:28 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgAHB8n5IEVjptVhAA--.24519S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWruw48Aw1UZrWUCFyfJr17GFg_yoW8Jr4Dpr W3GF9YyasIqFZF9F4Ig3WSqrW8Xw4rJry5J348W345ZrW7Cr9akw1DZ3ZYq3WxZrsrCF45 XFW5tFW09F40ka7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUyEb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4 vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7Cj xVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x 0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG 6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFV Cjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcVAKI48JMxk0xIA0c2IEe2xFo4CEbIxvr21l42xK82IYc2Ij 64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x 8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE 2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42 xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrZr1j6s0DMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE c7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_GrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU1zuWJUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Tejun ?? 2022/10/11 4:29, Tejun Heo ะด??: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:38:58AM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote: >> Function only make sure pd_alloc_fn and pd_free_fn in >> pairs, so pd_alloc_fn could be NULL in registered blkcg_policy. Check NULL >> before use for pd_alloc_fn in blkcg_activate_policy to avoid protential >> NULL dereference. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi >> --- >> block/blk-cgroup.c | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c >> index 463c568d3e86..fc083c35dc42 100644 >> --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c >> +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c >> @@ -1404,6 +1404,9 @@ int blkcg_activate_policy(struct request_queue *q, >> if (blkcg_policy_enabled(q, pol)) >> return 0; >> >> + if (pol->pd_alloc_fn == NULL) >> + return -EINVAL; > > This isn't the only place this function is called, so the above won't > achieve much. Given that this is rather trivially noticeable and all the > current users do implement pd_alloc_fn, I'm not sure we need to update this > now. It's right all the current users implement pd_alloc_fn, can we check pd_alloc/free_fn NULL instead in blkcg_policy_register()? Thanks, Kuai > > Thanks. >