Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 11 Oct 2022 12:53:18 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To:     Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 12/14] dt-bindings: net: dsa: ocelot: add
 ocelot-ext documentation
Message-ID: <20221011095318.mqbrk3jrfioiql4x@skbuf>
References: <YzzLCYHmTcrHbZcH@colin-ia-desktop>
 <455e31be-dc87-39b3-c7fe-22384959c556@linaro.org>
 <Yz2mSOXf68S16Xg/@colin-ia-desktop>
 <28b4d9f9-f41a-deca-aa61-26fb65dcc873@linaro.org>
 <20221008000014.vs2m3vei5la2r2nd@skbuf>
 <c9ce1d83-d1ca-4640-bba2-724e18e6e56b@linaro.org>
 <20221010130707.6z63hsl43ipd5run@skbuf>
 <d27d7740-bf35-b8d4-d68c-bb133513fa19@linaro.org>
 <20221010174856.nd3n4soxk7zbmcm7@skbuf>
 <Y0RoraHpuPbN5O4C@COLIN-DESKTOP1.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y0RoraHpuPbN5O4C@COLIN-DESKTOP1.localdomain>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:47:09AM -0700, Colin Foster wrote:
> Thank you for laying this path out for me. Hopefully when I go
> heads-down to implement this there won't be any gotchas. It seems pretty
> straightforward.
> 
> Maybe my only question would be where to send these patches. If these
> can all go through net-next it seems like there'd be no issue when step
> 8 (add 7512 documentation) comes along with this current patch set.
> 
> Otherwise this sounds good. I'll switch to getting a patch set of steps
> 1-7 as you suggest.

I have some doubts whether it would be good to also merge net/dsa/mscc,ocelot.yaml
(i.e. the NXP variants) into net/mscc,vsc7514-switch.yaml. A few "if" statements
on compatible string which decide the format of "reg" and of "reg-names" should cover
the differences. Not sure how the end result will look like.