Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp2245999rwi; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 06:39:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6QPM0ae2MMQSTcHvV5wIy6bj9JcMGj6iAsrkMGyNcsW2hBxURKWtwZOSvCPcOjJ5QNIaTl X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:d58:b0:458:5eca:a2c9 with SMTP id ec24-20020a0564020d5800b004585ecaa2c9mr23255371edb.306.1665495589921; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 06:39:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1665495589; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wpt6F3Szla8xqWHa4cw+lnneA6S655hvQqnDMSUA0o13ehwy3qQ9x2wV76gBDpPzYX KdipwV2EXhgKD0uXFCyO4e+iNanuTmfLqCX7tbCH675/6dgzaJaUaIFLcFOwUb9qrqtt b1tyOJiBDL0X1UgWqezrshSwBygQ9mkEm3vaREynXxyGi1+2rTeGVR7cHTHBGTio08FB 7ctWd5+i19h6eDae6Xa7gAFP6KnwCk8VPQLI/AGJdY/+N0sGOTt/NpCeXmg7S+z7xh/m SOh/dQBWABl9NZgiOE/Y6CIzTBlEXrbQ5TR7WIonUT02GcUeizDA53L9sSslYig2dD7C Dmdw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=4QaEQ1R82eVCDdFcuqQYOfjMLD/kzAy79NfsUuxoHeY=; b=Vwa+4kBKSE0bPRY6WA866VfCjcxkVwVJ+lhfO/xDP61TszYKKW9X1kDonkdL8GD/yC hMqSvjYTXCXWYphJ9L9URu8oXB5F+IHcyPgeX73wio1/Qa/aN+Akr3KQNO4QABQjt9IT 4Ko6AruK0jJJQn0DPmouhn+572MG7y5jvC4B44FnOBlJOvUsHVgpVZgcKHxZPPsixTWL f+SyZx9TiJXrIiEthO7Vi7As6Drya6/IZ7dvLHFXS7+TDPCtNdnUCS7Jc/LGloJPir+8 FhZWhtfs17PD5L+gdCjzrI//UTcIvgxqTXCASNXPQUwWL6r4PsE9MoJ7Ze7xqzVRVbtz 7ALg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=KD2ZPsLv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hu8-20020a170907a08800b0077c3308aea9si13623356ejc.707.2022.10.11.06.39.20; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 06:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=KD2ZPsLv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229484AbiJKM6D (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 08:58:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59950 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229829AbiJKM6A (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 08:58:00 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com (fllv0016.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DCFD915FB; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 05:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 29BCvf5l074097; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 07:57:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1665493061; bh=4QaEQ1R82eVCDdFcuqQYOfjMLD/kzAy79NfsUuxoHeY=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=KD2ZPsLvWvuHgclLcmIDfEiwu3a1Nrl4hvNBdYT57yFX8wAnWHuT809lB34khCUdv vIXA7iyi1IFL9VngsZvv1+L8cxCA4MxVkY/HVzvGLDsaujfl+4/0WbPj7mbAtsOyGL IWZE+YkBDM0jrz0GKDS22Ikg7rj+0aNWdbRO9EI0= Received: from DLEE109.ent.ti.com (dlee109.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.41]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 29BCvfBR034977 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 07:57:41 -0500 Received: from DLEE106.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.36) by DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.6; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 07:57:40 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DLEE106.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.6 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 07:57:41 -0500 Received: from [172.24.147.145] (ileaxei01-snat2.itg.ti.com [10.180.69.6]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 29BCvbBO019814; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 07:57:38 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] PCI: endpoint: Use callback mechanism for passing events from EPC to EPF To: Manivannan Sadhasivam , , , CC: , , , , , References: <20221006134927.41437-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> <20221006134927.41437-5-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 18:27:37 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20221006134927.41437-5-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mani, On 06/10/22 7:19 pm, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > Instead of using the notifiers for passing the events from EPC to EPF, > let's introduce a callback based mechanism where the EPF drivers can > populate relevant callbacks for EPC events they want to subscribe. > > The use of notifiers in kernel is not recommended if there is a real link > between the sender and receiver, like in this case. Also, the existing > atomic notifier forces the notification functions to be in atomic context > while the caller may be in non-atomic context. For instance, the two > in-kernel users of the notifiers, pcie-qcom and pcie-tegra194, both are > calling the notifier functions in non-atomic context (from threaded IRQ > handlers). This creates a sleeping in atomic context issue with the > existing EPF_TEST driver that calls the EPC APIs that may sleep. > > For all these reasons, let's get rid of the notifier chains and use the > simple callback mechanism for signalling the events from EPC to EPF > drivers. This preserves the context of the caller and avoids the latency > of going through a separate interface for triggering the notifications. > > As a first step of the transition, the core_init() callback is introduced > in this commit, that'll replace the existing CORE_INIT notifier used for > signalling the init complete event from EPC. > > During the occurrence of the event, EPC will go over the list of EPF > drivers attached to it and will call the core_init() callback if available. > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam > --- > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 13 ++++++------- > drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 11 ++++++++++- > include/linux/pci-epf.h | 11 ++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c > index a6f906a96669..868de17e1ad2 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c > @@ -826,20 +826,17 @@ static int pci_epf_test_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf) > return 0; > } > > +static const struct pci_epc_event_ops pci_epf_test_event_ops = { > + .core_init = pci_epf_test_core_init, > +}; > + > static int pci_epf_test_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, > void *data) > { > struct pci_epf *epf = container_of(nb, struct pci_epf, nb); > struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf); > - int ret; > > switch (val) { > - case CORE_INIT: > - ret = pci_epf_test_core_init(epf); > - if (ret) > - return NOTIFY_BAD; > - break; > - > case LINK_UP: > queue_delayed_work(kpcitest_workqueue, &epf_test->cmd_handler, > msecs_to_jiffies(1)); > @@ -1010,6 +1007,8 @@ static int pci_epf_test_probe(struct pci_epf *epf, const struct pci_epf_device_i > > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&epf_test->cmd_handler, pci_epf_test_cmd_handler); > > + epf->event_ops = &pci_epf_test_event_ops; Doesn't this ignore epc_features input from the controller driver? > + > epf_set_drvdata(epf, epf_test); > return 0; > } > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c > index 6cce430d431b..ba54f17ae06f 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c > @@ -707,10 +707,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_linkup); > */ > void pci_epc_init_notify(struct pci_epc *epc) > { > + struct pci_epf *epf; > + > if (!epc || IS_ERR(epc)) > return; > > - atomic_notifier_call_chain(&epc->notifier, CORE_INIT, NULL); > + mutex_lock(&epc->list_lock); > + list_for_each_entry(epf, &epc->pci_epf, list) { > + mutex_lock(&epf->lock); > + if (epf->event_ops->core_init) This would result in abort if the endpoint function driver is not bound to endpoint device and the notify is called. This would also require all function drivers to have event_ops populated. IOW this could break pci-epf-ntb.c. Thanks, Kishon