Message-ID: <46820316.7070406@ringle.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 02:26:30 -0400
From: Jon Ringle <jon@ringle.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
CC: Jon Ringle <JRingle@vertical.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scheduling while atomic and DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP
References: <4DD3AF7ECBBC43409BA36508938D01851B0E7E@CVAEX1.VERTICAL.COM> <1182919609.3201.2.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
In-Reply-To: <1182919609.3201.2.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1085
Lines: 30

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 22:55 -0400, Jon Ringle wrote:
>   
>> Hello,
>> Out of these two, the first one that is showing "in_atomic():1" seems
>> more likely to me to be a potential cause of the "scheduling while
>> atomic" dump.
>>
>> Does this logic seem reasonable? Are there other debugging techniques I
>> can use to narrow down the cause for the "scheduling while atomic"?
>>     
>
>
> you could start by giving us pointers to the sources of the two
> drivers... without that... how can we look and help?
>
>   
You can get Intel's source from here:
GPL_ixp400LinuxEthernetDriverPatch-1_5.zip:
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/detail_desc.aspx?agr=N&ProductID=2100&DwnldID=9519

BSD_ixp400AccessLibrary-2_1.zip:
http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scripts-df/detail_desc.asp?agr=Y&ProductID=2100&DwnldID=10146

Jon
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/