Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp2759145rwi; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:00:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7vR+9MrHqjcdhdoGWbmssz3uwXm5IlQB+e5ivvWqFZ9tbFOqEefnVmhCYe55t6WEmBaFsW X-Received: by 2002:a63:ed01:0:b0:445:4345:4a21 with SMTP id d1-20020a63ed01000000b0044543454a21mr22450078pgi.404.1665518437003; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:00:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1665518436; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cQ/RjXEdRExa8/8efh5xFSq90HmhgkQ1lRDUnGGBVv6MHZUGChHwaaLkXWr/xXwwc2 AN0mDWyi5jssVsvu9xN9rqTNS4TxTD2py5KPMcyeuish2bvvWOng8OUpha0NKrIn4puq R0497j09dIRbXCoY8okW5EwWcoczFhVVsvGG7IFefTbLDGYfxPFK1WUSEtaJsFGmQeCy /L6LEJz5cxujmYzuR2cOT0kui4H1VQNGRx/JjtUx5Vn+LJgydP4h70rXgddm30PLDg+7 pGu8euVJDsoaQN3W2b7ZXpmDm4eE1Tu8Ieymw3iFT4P2Hoh0ScEyJ8kynsJJKCQJvxXY UiLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=iyHcM7UXo6+KI6U5ZBV2AMB4YpVhQ1f2WHVW8eRrXJQ=; b=Wf/+qkepEchvJk/nEQ22IKgL0hquSnhn82IG2iOs2cwTQioMRmgpxhhtr+qRaQOeWu YiuLL8XiXGJn6vOsXD+ulWBvC6+Lf7gusN4n/k5tJHBbrF6M2i77Nq/ryU17uXeH6OFT WelDjxH4OrROgF+++fxoLL7tjWfJ8ROSHRJwAI51bc4nXb+OuGR6DaDkK/0p9f8/rO+N PSvAild8LaWfzlRM+aYSG911Aua2IVFFUj0D3esmi0hGjuc0rHAX8NBuWPVbIST4L19y da8kUHM36IthAWHbxxUbLlTLFrUlRopUE87yPKR7c1XVzOMfL7ueJWEN97GmP1Jl9und 1MkQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b="dQbN/0Bk"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w4-20020a170902e88400b001753958498dsi20390780plg.492.2022.10.11.13.00.25; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b="dQbN/0Bk"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229487AbiJKT4E (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 15:56:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53030 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229560AbiJKTz4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 15:55:56 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D61177EB1; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 12:55:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id c24so14209208pls.9; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 12:55:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iyHcM7UXo6+KI6U5ZBV2AMB4YpVhQ1f2WHVW8eRrXJQ=; b=dQbN/0BkKXoVBGYIoreyCOPFY9ii0ukdeu4JwTY8nEz9R0ae/ZfRcOD0wosr1JlFzr O5xsqJa6jHA8dowpEIJH6wYTzaF+VBPpn6BwljyzhpT47hB/Avc4jVIclH1HHnL7LLLW T3eJtlZDQE3eLrp5ndQzsX4qz584t7py4BC6wjUTrwr4GVriqxI8CSmEDPo2chgZaDWe 2fkpC7YXn+4upKWjjFzVXn8w8Qd3foAsotDbIAlWNk0PXmTHz+N0tVitBoNExtUHphFd XwrPNyM5F0zUFLv1OBLApmgAz8g6t2H1zxWwOWbpPIxHWJGLeLKvLa0FhYMQZKlJzTKa oMYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=iyHcM7UXo6+KI6U5ZBV2AMB4YpVhQ1f2WHVW8eRrXJQ=; b=1jSwu5HX+udYaDTS5DaXfS4m8X54XY/2u48yYVPiPWmVdWlZf8yRkX17qNIUFpeKjD TpNw6nAZO5Ciey/iQdX06EErHGg+3NgmMXfUDgb5A8GuP/EnP6954g79x0YLI4uimo5/ 8Sj0ccOp+It4ZSrj2gTtNEmIfHEM7MnMSnyjIriM0kzLLrHNY/KRbdsyRdeW4QrnR4cG M/pSSSqNdXbiD1P58ayThwR5acEOcKaRo0z+EKef08cGlXzMmbsLyimkf9vwBeVSS5Fi Edtf7wCOKznXORUGPvoEEH2H/G51wXoRntXHhNl0RyOM/Z4W2c5F5RuiwbHBBHNecVsJ VyjA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1ZTXEpzHXRYB6xGO0WCaauacZR3aslv13AAOvNEpIzCAMR3ZKO hRRifuzGdHfcrTuS0bJ9RePCNy/Yx/A5pA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1bd0:b0:205:ed0c:7e84 with SMTP id oa16-20020a17090b1bd000b00205ed0c7e84mr921987pjb.234.1665518152627; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 12:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.google.com (122-58-209-93-fibre.sparkbb.co.nz. [122.58.209.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lt23-20020a17090b355700b0020a9f7405aesm7070046pjb.13.2022.10.11.12.55.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 12:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 08:55:46 +1300 From: Paulo Miguel Almeida To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Cc: Christine Caulfield , David Teigland , cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [next] dlm: replace one-element array with fixed size array Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 02:37:40PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 08:28:54AM +1300, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote: > > > > > I didn't add v3 here because the the patch got changed from 'replacing > > [1]-array with flex-array' to 'replacing [1]-array to fixed-size array'. > > The issue remains the same, and there have been comments and feedback on > previous patches. So, yep, v3 seems appropiate for this patch. :) > > > > > Let me know if you still want me to send it as v3 instead. > > I think next one would be v4. > > Also, when versioning patches it is also necessary to include a version > change log. > Fair enough. Will send a v4 Paulo A.