Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp3479153rwi; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 02:36:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5Uz4jzUqsAdx98RKFbqwlzDjOrxbs6r5W9FykjUIJwtX8MVwddC+/cP7j6Km65ALImbEeh X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:40d3:b0:45b:de1d:7e99 with SMTP id z19-20020a05640240d300b0045bde1d7e99mr18631604edb.199.1665567405625; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 02:36:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1665567405; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=T0vKOTs7WICTT2ZjccgimyOC8QokjynDXLMwB9Bh42Fa6srQJOXDLULLFHh6Ro5DnY zRA2wIkbb4yVfCDz/2weblzdr2aysLtoq16h8sxRS1Qjs+CoZqVksDznAF9JNrFdRvzQ rYfsWxtacmLuoWCzdGfxJcCAxZ1RBRi7m725TgJ1hEKeO4NLk00zsLPjz83qvrV8JLV7 jJgbYl9TCVdInq+Oc7+BQrAMc9IbU4+lR4kYPSFAFitodmXWjYu0g6VZI5TJLIAnRwK8 hLl5s48KvtaDwKXg0ms3Syr09wqN1A49vSCbYkxIDCjAjyqGWxItUqjekOKFq1tptkf9 fGPg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=qFCityJK1YuPUp5S96vHn3i1Yo3pTLoeqv1q6VMdR0o=; b=qHyys/PChzwHULYRYMYjE9XsTk1mQgiDENaMfIab0bTDN1JLDUzTuCOYw+YAiKJehV t49PKgb0Q26x9GI/C7fhrDR2Ou6xmNTdH/znK+ozVdhqBq3YxWZZZaCoHbaGOy8pQYXm 2qz8+vH48+7XUgqlFM2lBa4MiYFh0lB7hPo1ZoYw5xoFND6rmvoLDGr9rLmyHAqMaiPG DoOJol6pHyXVlNrhv6dp8mYBUXFB0ahDOzDmVKALpK7ZFL9OVBcXzO64+c0mH4y6YAj7 fTjHE6JH31SY0FkGp45uaj6+UEShltlLb//k1o1iiafqwtyYBWfiztOayTcVF+jvNx1r 8fIQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q4-20020a50c344000000b00454b9403108si14220205edb.219.2022.10.12.02.36.20; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 02:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229822AbiJLJ3Y (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Oct 2022 05:29:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34142 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229533AbiJLJ3W (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2022 05:29:22 -0400 Received: from fornost.hmeau.com (helcar.hmeau.com [216.24.177.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F42326DFA4; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 02:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gwarestrin.arnor.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.103.7]) by fornost.hmeau.com with smtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Debian)) id 1oiY2r-00DtAP-6F; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:28:58 +1100 Received: by gwarestrin.arnor.me.apana.org.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:28:57 +0800 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:28:57 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: Christian Langrock Cc: Steffen Klassert , davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec v6] xfrm: replay: Fix ESN wrap around for GSO Message-ID: References: <6810817b-e6b7-feac-64f8-c83c517ae9a5@secunet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6810817b-e6b7-feac-64f8-c83c517ae9a5@secunet.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 04:50:15PM +0200, Christian Langrock wrote: > When using GSO it can happen that the wrong seq_hi is used for the last > packets before the wrap around. This can lead to double usage of a > sequence number. To avoid this, we should serialize this last GSO > packet. > > Fixes: d7dbefc45cf5 ("xfrm: Add xfrm_replay_overflow functions for offloading") > Co-developed-by: Steffen Klassert > Signed-off-by: Christian Langrock > --- > Changes in v6: > - move overflow check to offloading path to avoid locking issues > > Changes in v5: > - Fix build > > Changes in v4: > - move changelog within comment > - add reviewer > > Changes in v3: > - fix build > - remove wrapper function > > Changes in v2: > - switch to bool as return value > - remove switch case in wrapper function > --- > net/ipv4/esp4_offload.c | 3 +++ > net/ipv6/esp6_offload.c | 3 +++ > net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- > net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Could you please explain how this code restructure makes it safe with respect to multiple users of the same xfrm_state? Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt