Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221012144846.2963749-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
In-Reply-To: <20221012144846.2963749-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:23:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wj=62F=soverz1NT41B1_CMtaxnUZX+_qGQ3mbeQdjivg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] LoongArch changes for v6.1
To:     Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
        loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
        Xuerui Wang <kernel@xen0n.name>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 7:51 AM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn> wrote:
>
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chenhuacai/linux-loongson.git tags/loongarch-6.1

Grr.

This was rebased mere hours before the pull request.

Much (all?) of it has been in next - with different commit IDs, of
course, but the question remains why you have rebased it?

It just makes it much less convenient for me to check "was this in
next?" and is generally a *horrible* thing to do.

                       Linus