Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220929172356.301342-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <CA+V-a8vD1+kbby8rbZqYv2Ux1GaT=7n7V9qHJS3Djv-fKdWrAQ@mail.gmail.com> <57e454f4-6767-bf42-8337-ce1f486137ca@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <57e454f4-6767-bf42-8337-ce1f486137ca@linaro.org>
From:   "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:00:11 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8sfhHeFa=NAUvZH+DDUjRbdFoCqr4itiYHzxv_jSY9HWg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] RZ/G2UL separate out SoC specific parts
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        DT <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
        Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Krzysztof,

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 4:38 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/10/2022 05:41, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > Hi Rob, Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 6:24 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> This patch series aims to split up the RZ/G2UL SoC DTSI into common parts
> >> so that this can be shared with the RZ/Five SoC.
> >>
> >> Implementation is based on the discussion [0] where I have used option#2.
> >>
> >> The Renesas RZ/G2UL (ARM64) and RZ/Five (RISC-V) have almost the same
> >> identical blocks to avoid duplication a base SoC dtsi (r9a07g043.dtsi) is
> >> created which will be used by the RZ/G2UL (r9a07g043u.dtsi) and RZ/Five
> >> (r9a07g043F.dtsi)
> >>
> >> Sending this as an RFC to get some feedback.
> >>
> >> r9a07g043f.dtsi will look something like below:
> >>
> >> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> >>
> >> #define SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ_NUMBER(nr)   (nr + 32)
> >> #define SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ(nr, na)      SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ_NUMBER(nr) na
> >>
> >> #include <arm64/renesas/r9a07g043.dtsi>
> >>
> >> / {
> >>    ...
> >>    ...
> >> };
> >>
> >> Although patch#2 can be merged into patch#1 just wanted to keep them separated
> >> for easier review.
> >>
> >> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/Yyt8s5+pyoysVNeC@spud/T/
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Prabhakar
> >>
> >> Lad Prabhakar (2):
> >>   arm64: dts: renesas: r9a07g043: Introduce SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ() macro
> >>     to specify interrupt property
> >
> > Can either of you please review patch #1.
> >
>
> Why? This is a DTS patch, isn't it? You should CC rather platform
> maintainers, architecture maintainers and SoC folks (the latter you
> missed for sure). You missed them, so please resend.
>
Mainly because we are using the SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ() macro while
specifying the interrupts property and just wanted to make sure the DT
maintainers are OK with that.

Sure I'll resend the patches CC'ing ARCH maintainers after v6.1-rc1.

Cheers,
Prabhakar