Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp4318642rwi; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 13:59:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM57T8QP0FwxTTXLXEYe6SlGfPG1xiaH/3489yLXxxAWGDA/qjex27Ys/2/EMr00oyYwJ32m X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:c45:b0:442:c549:8e6b with SMTP id cs5-20020a0564020c4500b00442c5498e6bmr29539996edb.123.1665608371594; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 13:59:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1665608371; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dW6JyzgJP8X6mV5hxRX0voPjxQYQjhObIm4qbqO1JAyYtGc0ne7pUy+vZwt47bwYYQ FxdvvGHbSGTIB98m+xcVd+NDTSqFQFX1jnsAfzJlVpN8/VI78l6/VXChrf0fvpwjQ+YG o5fHSXY//0WIlNAI/srpNvWQUlgDwDS9RTwYa9tZfPUZ4JHGcD51Ua9FHyNeVHlXgzFO uN/mANjIj38TMXvEDtLgsow/XJJUNnlj+Z5HpuA2x6d95wrwllqLovzBPZuQRpJBdKJT a/H/+Gdkv5VsfBsvqSGWj530KfWZxUIQjdeI0KzaE3LMb5lqo2Q/zpodY8iGVTW5fKP0 oR1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=9sjzWyKdmZ9OHhAKFmjjGkydIB7vKqM9NhqC/8vlv8Y=; b=oQUHbXK02eUMqgNISyvOLPdrkdmi2cTSi8Id0oM8+7OwEfTlDdgO3B7Q9v9UCPTA5T tzscRy4md9/jd23mvGG2082YjgzoyLqvYq9fZJBPLtJiHxX4NRjwqmIIoWqOakOgYSjH iq6EGIhgJI+pOWqmGf71D3udjp7mmLq7WbGfhLRdE3xQgcA13qYSBs1zqqURAIaefiu6 ralkV3rsGhGcWHYHxz52KgQLoX5K2XVlBJmMTj2PBHOQBhibig8j2rfyDnJ3D/xOa6PP cdAfBe1akzLMyxtvO3DtY9/xX5ddRFXuH9YH9I6ebzFfCDVAj683rQKSpfT9xIlKqcYx j/Ag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b=LOSgfJ4C; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qa42-20020a17090786aa00b0078d8db64fffsi13967278ejc.20.2022.10.12.13.59.06; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 13:59:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b=LOSgfJ4C; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229866AbiJLUsM (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:48:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49554 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229905AbiJLUsD (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:48:03 -0400 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81F655E556; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 13:47:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=9sjzWyKdmZ9OHhAKFmjjGkydIB7vKqM9NhqC/8vlv8Y=; b=LOSgfJ4C+rzH5Qa9aLLf1JkUWk +VzpDxeba7h2b44jUArU54rfYAIiCnJDuQT9GqdHFrqlbpH2WH8Xz8wK5OzwYZAt17nEtQ37C4hK2 UEavj5NENKwlyFIJn6DyrGMaEDg6p4BnLkgFBxWDX7Nx0R7/Ps2oA8Zgj2bh60gjBNlo1awu2m8Fx gkqsyXQhc+H4OagJixgZgM6v7jMNsyOTKTLuVmz67xCbE6kRvxIyDB+Dv4LwoQBUAlJEJtN14uk/D IyZRdLuFYVw0nbTtXsFZlU3FzXKl1J39rbJi5vJWvg1x8Q3DDL/xVfaOUrzy3/ImaJRPizT1j16E7 8WLBSZ9w==; Received: from j130084.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.130.84] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oiidN-002wt9-7C; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:47:22 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70541300023; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 22:47:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 56BEA2B6BE2AB; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 22:47:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 22:47:19 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ravi Bangoria Cc: acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, songliubraving@fb.com, eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, frederic@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, irogers@google.com, will@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, ndesaulniers@google.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sandipan.das@amd.com, ananth.narayan@amd.com, kim.phillips@amd.com, santosh.shukla@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Rewrite core context handling Message-ID: References: <20221008062424.313-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com> <174fb540-ec18-eeca-191d-c02e1f1005d2@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 02:16:29PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > That's the intent yeah. But due to not always holding ctx->mutex over > put_pmu_ctx() this might be moot. I'm almost through auditing epc usage > and I think ctx->lock is sufficient, fingers crossed. So the very last epc usage threw a spanner into the works and made things complicated. Specifically sys_perf_event_open()'s group_leader case uses event->pmu_ctx while only holding ctx->mutex. Therefore we can't fully let go of ctx->mutex locking and purely rely on ctx->lock. Now the good news is that the annoying put_pmu_ctx() without holding ctx->mutex case doesn't actually matter here. Since we hold a reference on the group_leader (per the filedesc) the event can't go away, therefore it must have a pmu_ctx, and then holding ctx->mutex ensures the pmu_ctx is stable -- iow it serializes against sys_perf_event_open()'s move_group and perf_pmu_migrate_context() changing the epc around. So we're going with the normal mutex+lock for modification rule, but allow the weird put_pmu_ctx() exception. I have the below delta. I'm hoping we can call this done -- I'm going to see if I can bribe Mark to take a look at the arm64 thing soon and then hopefully queue the whole thing once -rc1 happens. That should give us a good long soak until the next merge window. --- --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h @@ -826,21 +826,28 @@ struct perf_event { }; /* - * ,------------------------[1:n]---------------------. + * ,-----------------------[1:n]----------------------. * V V * perf_event_context <-[1:n]-> perf_event_pmu_context <--- perf_event * ^ ^ | | * `--------[1:n]---------' `-[n:1]-> pmu <-[1:n]-' * * - * XXX destroy epc when empty - * refcount, !rcu - * - * XXX epc locking - * - * event->pmu_ctx ctx->mutex && inactive - * ctx->pmu_ctx_list ctx->mutex && ctx->lock - * + * struct perf_event_pmu_context lifetime is refcount based and RCU freed + * (similar to perf_event_context). Locking is as if it were a member of + * perf_event_context; specifically: + * + * modification, both: ctx->mutex && ctx->lock + * reading, either: ctx->mutex || ctx->lock + * + * There is one exception to this; namely put_pmu_ctx() isn't always called + * with ctx->mutex held; this means that as long as we can guarantee the epc + * has events the above rules hold. + * + * Specificially, sys_perf_event_open()'s group_leader case depends on + * ctx->mutex pinning the configuration. Since we hold a reference on + * group_leader (through the filedesc) it can't fo away, therefore it's + * associated pmu_ctx must exist and cannot change due to ctx->mutex. */ struct perf_event_pmu_context { struct pmu *pmu; @@ -857,6 +864,7 @@ struct perf_event_pmu_context { unsigned int nr_events; atomic_t refcount; /* event <-> epc */ + struct rcu_head rcu_head; void *task_ctx_data; /* pmu specific data */ /* @@ -906,7 +914,7 @@ struct perf_event_context { int nr_freq; int rotate_disable; - refcount_t refcount; + refcount_t refcount; /* event <-> ctx */ struct task_struct *task; /* --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -1727,6 +1727,10 @@ perf_event_groups_next(struct perf_event return NULL; } +#define perf_event_groups_for_cpu_pmu(event, groups, cpu, pmu) \ + for (event = perf_event_groups_first(groups, cpu, pmu, NULL); \ + event; event = perf_event_groups_next(event, pmu)) + /* * Iterate through the whole groups tree. */ @@ -3366,6 +3370,14 @@ static void perf_event_sync_stat(struct } } +#define double_list_for_each_entry(pos1, pos2, head1, head2, member) \ + for (pos1 = list_first_entry(head1, typeof(*pos1), member), \ + pos2 = list_first_entry(head2, typeof(*pos2), member); \ + !list_entry_is_head(pos1, head1, member) && \ + !list_entry_is_head(pos2, head2, member); \ + pos1 = list_next_entry(pos1, member), \ + pos2 = list_next_entry(pos2, member)) + static void perf_event_swap_task_ctx_data(struct perf_event_context *prev_ctx, struct perf_event_context *next_ctx) { @@ -3374,17 +3386,12 @@ static void perf_event_swap_task_ctx_dat if (!prev_ctx->nr_task_data) return; - prev_epc = list_first_entry(&prev_ctx->pmu_ctx_list, - struct perf_event_pmu_context, - pmu_ctx_entry); - next_epc = list_first_entry(&next_ctx->pmu_ctx_list, - struct perf_event_pmu_context, - pmu_ctx_entry); - - while (&prev_epc->pmu_ctx_entry != &prev_ctx->pmu_ctx_list && - &next_epc->pmu_ctx_entry != &next_ctx->pmu_ctx_list) { + double_list_for_each_entry(prev_epc, next_epc, + &prev_ctx->pmu_ctx_list, &next_ctx->pmu_ctx_list, + pmu_ctx_entry) { - WARN_ON_ONCE(prev_epc->pmu != next_epc->pmu); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(prev_epc->pmu != next_epc->pmu)) + continue; /* * PMU specific parts of task perf context can require @@ -3706,7 +3713,6 @@ static noinline int visit_groups_merge(s perf_assert_pmu_disabled((*evt)->pmu_ctx->pmu); } - min_heapify_all(&event_heap, &perf_min_heap); while (event_heap.nr) { @@ -3845,7 +3851,6 @@ ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context * /* start ctx time */ __update_context_time(ctx, false); perf_cgroup_set_timestamp(cpuctx); - // XXX ctx->task =? task /* * CPU-release for the below ->is_active store, * see __load_acquire() in perf_event_time_now() @@ -4815,6 +4820,15 @@ find_get_pmu_context(struct pmu *pmu, st __perf_init_event_pmu_context(new, pmu); + /* + * XXX + * + * lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex); + * + * can't because perf_event_init_task() doesn't actually hold the + * child_ctx->mutex. + */ + raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock); list_for_each_entry(epc, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list, pmu_ctx_entry) { if (epc->pmu == pmu) { @@ -4849,6 +4863,14 @@ static void get_pmu_ctx(struct perf_even WARN_ON_ONCE(!atomic_inc_not_zero(&epc->refcount)); } +static void free_epc_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) +{ + struct perf_event_pmu_context *epc = container_of(head, typeof(*epc), rcu_head); + + kfree(epc->task_ctx_data); + kfree(epc); +} + static void put_pmu_ctx(struct perf_event_pmu_context *epc) { unsigned long flags; @@ -4859,7 +4881,14 @@ static void put_pmu_ctx(struct perf_even if (epc->ctx) { struct perf_event_context *ctx = epc->ctx; - // XXX ctx->mutex + /* + * XXX + * + * lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex); + * + * can't because of the call-site in _free_event()/put_event() + * which isn't always called under ctx->mutex. + */ WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&epc->pmu_ctx_entry)); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags); @@ -4874,17 +4903,15 @@ static void put_pmu_ctx(struct perf_even if (epc->embedded) return; - kfree(epc->task_ctx_data); - kfree(epc); + call_rcu(&epc->rcu_head, free_epc_rcu); } static void perf_event_free_filter(struct perf_event *event); static void free_event_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) { - struct perf_event *event; + struct perf_event *event = container_of(head, typeof(*event), rcu_head); - event = container_of(head, struct perf_event, rcu_head); if (event->ns) put_pid_ns(event->ns); perf_event_free_filter(event); @@ -12436,6 +12463,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, * Allow the addition of software events to hw * groups, this is safe because software events * never fail to schedule. + * + * Note the comment that goes with struct + * pmu_event_pmu_context. */ pmu = group_leader->pmu_ctx->pmu; } else if (!is_software_event(event) && @@ -12643,13 +12673,6 @@ perf_event_create_kernel_counter(struct goto err_alloc; } - pmu_ctx = find_get_pmu_context(pmu, ctx, event); - if (IS_ERR(pmu_ctx)) { - err = PTR_ERR(pmu_ctx); - goto err_ctx; - } - event->pmu_ctx = pmu_ctx; - WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->parent_ctx); mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex); if (ctx->task == TASK_TOMBSTONE) { @@ -12657,6 +12680,13 @@ perf_event_create_kernel_counter(struct goto err_unlock; } + pmu_ctx = find_get_pmu_context(pmu, ctx, event); + if (IS_ERR(pmu_ctx)) { + err = PTR_ERR(pmu_ctx); + goto err_unlock; + } + event->pmu_ctx = pmu_ctx; + if (!task) { /* * Check if the @cpu we're creating an event for is online. @@ -12668,13 +12698,13 @@ perf_event_create_kernel_counter(struct container_of(ctx, struct perf_cpu_context, ctx); if (!cpuctx->online) { err = -ENODEV; - goto err_unlock; + goto err_pmu_ctx; } } if (!exclusive_event_installable(event, ctx)) { err = -EBUSY; - goto err_unlock; + goto err_pmu_ctx; } perf_install_in_context(ctx, event, event->cpu); @@ -12683,9 +12713,10 @@ perf_event_create_kernel_counter(struct return event; +err_pmu_ctx: + put_pmu_ctx(pmu_ctx); err_unlock: mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex); -err_ctx: perf_unpin_context(ctx); put_ctx(ctx); err_alloc: @@ -12702,9 +12733,7 @@ static void __perf_pmu_remove(struct per { struct perf_event *event, *sibling; - for (event = perf_event_groups_first(groups, cpu, pmu, NULL); - event; event = perf_event_groups_next(event, pmu)) { - + perf_event_groups_for_cpu_pmu(event, groups, cpu, pmu) { perf_remove_from_context(event, 0); unaccount_event_cpu(event, cpu); put_pmu_ctx(event->pmu_ctx); @@ -12998,7 +13027,7 @@ void perf_event_free_task(struct task_st struct perf_event_context *ctx; struct perf_event *event, *tmp; - ctx = rcu_dereference(task->perf_event_ctxp); + ctx = rcu_access_pointer(task->perf_event_ctxp); if (!ctx) return;