Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp37442rwi; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:35:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5SPVc+GAX8xaQwGXhm6aJ8NsKVXVT9rRlzsWtB5I+B27Q2hdN1aWQ+ve/wUL8RHEKgAzSU X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5a6a:b0:78d:d25e:55de with SMTP id my42-20020a1709065a6a00b0078dd25e55demr8632689ejc.130.1665614145951; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:35:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1665614145; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gOIjlcTTTmjia9FZu6vIERRuSJTJJrkvQyBcGRulQznp1e49oW5tmDoMMxxBcPkoq5 5q5nHghLfOH6OGn0x1ZPBjzSOwkcvclIHSNt61l+j273w3ivPnxiHFTqyDtk7pDGYevX /8561xar/ce/8PfoICtVfyGSxu8FEbbx3JZaJkweIfmNbuxPxm1nDOWJw+P9ZIMx3ad0 /q8pSfgxP68z7/brvsInfQXsk0ZtGdXLrDCdcCT1A7bET69QNPQ5uElLgKRALy8Z73FM O5KuEcjpDwBumQaHvvGYkB0Q8dl6/++SzvbbBAX2oobBadMskFIj87FjJBmIou0tBBpz tr8A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=Su2L4w7MYWf4tpEe7WGqgPhggn7BzrL3XLCbukDkUsI=; b=vsDOpkb9gOfbcDX2dX1vSgT45qfj5F+vUnxun3Xnd4wXw1OCryFICCIyWxMmEPpcGH rPgsto9WerBExgC/oFSgG3CZCMjfVUj5OKx1wwzMB8K7+C07OzUlR10wph3AkbDrGHsw DrqwhrfLAppFryxX8J/G+T9/+ljaXMjbdBF6nqGMjzwrcqpyG+Z6M4m47KUxBBVhu6m+ L41mgJshCArPG+emRhjzS/FNuXLPJqp57sj78cw4VSKYVwTnFVDkdB0TtO4hz+ADpX2t 4PS/l3+n9ye9qWxMWRVHvK3zThSK1aJFO7URRqZj9jJZqe4f//pvpqOPHR9kSqHl9Foz PLQQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o9-20020a170906974900b00782686da1d1si19377499ejy.761.2022.10.12.15.35.19; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:35:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229919AbiJLWS6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Oct 2022 18:18:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56496 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229514AbiJLWS4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2022 18:18:56 -0400 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc (Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:520::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFB3FA5710; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:18:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fw by Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oik3l-0005in-4F; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:18:41 +0200 Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:18:41 +0200 From: Florian Westphal To: Daniel Xu Cc: Martin KaFai Lau , pablo@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, memxor@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] selftests/bpf: Add connmark read test Message-ID: <20221012221841.GA11818@breakpoint.cc> References: <43bf4a5f-dac9-4fe9-1eba-9ab9beb650aa@linux.dev> <20221012220953.i2xevhu36kxyxscl@k2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221012220953.i2xevhu36kxyxscl@k2> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Xu wrote: > > Warning: Extension CONNMARK revision 0 not supported, missing kernel module? > > iptables v1.8.8 (nf_tables): Could not fetch rule set generation id: > > Invalid argument Martin, can you give result of modinfo xt_CONNMARK and modinfo nft_compat? I suspect your kernel lacks nf_tables support. > > iptables v1.8.8 (nf_tables): Could not fetch rule set generation id: > > Invalid argument Probably a kernel without nftables support? > So perhaps iptables/nftables suffered a regression somewhere. I'll take > a closer look tonight / tomorrow morning. Possible but unlikely, all those tests pass for me.