Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp134121rwi; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:21:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5YSBUTIjXdiyZgWAi7nxKnzQ6yB3lXcXfWCrbRacIifFHcLGHVqiw1QAGDyUCXueCr9zSR X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8a66:b0:78b:da52:b752 with SMTP id hy6-20020a1709068a6600b0078bda52b752mr24356850ejc.365.1665620461589; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:21:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1665620461; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=q4iUqNvhaehIML9g8XjmdajujBwoLcfJPrm4H10LeYSrpDYp6BGukM9tVJfHRwltcY VR+EZ8FXsoy71/5YFrAuV0iSZGLwSdSbzvRWPnwhT5ROYzmPBdHwZH6adDqKIjDTXQk1 60y8Ak76MNtJk1L0f8HkppM0a4SR301A4Q98aKG7vO+C6JTnPwC7FStdTFqGLc4cnd8t yJVIYpK2PeUu5R84bj4gYM6hOm/TuMhhu0Mrvim6ZJzyoAZVf2Lg7q/+60rEGWgZeT8C zgHyOeoXPISV1scVf9kNQ5sHZTIZ4zitxIco7qwhjtnW1mw9bj4QBrtBJqMDjlrBdBb0 l/MA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=wcDkUeUQc/SkDILmiI0yP+JqNGi2jytDuErkXD01vOI=; b=th/kYpIKJ8PDueuZvxBlLq6xG0dFXvqiNiTPG/f15oYjqnGLYj4eMRVwWqgqFDc0j5 qMxRpBOZUIcCvSkAzDRJpnmUzYj/7j1owZW2ycXsL2tQoxL4Xy4asiSdlq68bmzq/y2E vJ0PHwTvtwS5jLJD4yVqpCNlsPuNC5mL17+M2zBDa/ngMlU0xpc8ziIKXs86AsTiBnbN wgu8Hall4ExIsOY+A8hX/HMnEbRueDsbO9l4rQaQA9ni4sImom1E/XQXkThgK/fJa6h9 gEYFayB2d7kPg4KyLhOiydzqxWEnmNWzLiQa9O3E6V1XZJnA+cI8RDnWpgS67/MgMtJW POtw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="Hb+x7ma/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ot1-20020a170906ccc100b0078da3cd3073si10532739ejb.628.2022.10.12.17.20.35; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:21:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="Hb+x7ma/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230043AbiJMASa (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:18:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37946 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229985AbiJMARn (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:17:43 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07035197F90; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:17:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4FBD616C3; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:17:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63019C433B5; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:17:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1665620222; bh=pyFqEjCsJm/B3AhoMs/+9UBXpGWPBTmE33Qm6IaChXk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Hb+x7ma/xB1r6VtzODtR8VRi7s1qktFY6oJAzH47PFN2psjHuFowCerhcFmL7WJGp B3EoDuhabEhwdNj70m8XCJAJ/pVgEcQWjXsG72XC3CYTrog5Bkd2ysHv0B+IBTj3/Z rOQwYuJeiRC+ZcGvGOqD+YhbBdsck66BKC2iT95WpfNwl8Twtn+fAuL0PpVD1Gku/n Y9eselOMMkQD2+ds8WWMu+NtWG0fJX7waoYuzIBD/hDKS96EOh1ezc/AV7FglCu8v7 8Z6yl2PGnLi6AwbTFTarN0RLnJhoMq8/VpZxgUw9uTnmCeGL8JZzm0J4CeGqu3y8Xd K6TJVdpDKI8Nw== From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Coly Li , Mingzhe Zou , Jens Axboe , Sasha Levin , kent.overstreet@gmail.com, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 27/67] bcache: fix set_at_max_writeback_rate() for multiple attached devices Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:15:08 -0400 Message-Id: <20221013001554.1892206-27-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20221013001554.1892206-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20221013001554.1892206-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Coly Li [ Upstream commit d2d05b88035d2d51a5bb6c5afec88a0880c73df4 ] Inside set_at_max_writeback_rate() the calculation in following if() check is wrong, if (atomic_inc_return(&c->idle_counter) < atomic_read(&c->attached_dev_nr) * 6) Because each attached backing device has its own writeback thread running and increasing c->idle_counter, the counter increates much faster than expected. The correct calculation should be, (counter / dev_nr) < dev_nr * 6 which equals to, counter < dev_nr * dev_nr * 6 This patch fixes the above mistake with correct calculation, and helper routine idle_counter_exceeded() is added to make code be more clear. Reported-by: Mingzhe Zou Signed-off-by: Coly Li Acked-by: Mingzhe Zou Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220919161647.81238-6-colyli@suse.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c index 3f0ff3aab6f2..9c227e4a8465 100644 --- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c @@ -157,6 +157,53 @@ static void __update_writeback_rate(struct cached_dev *dc) dc->writeback_rate_target = target; } +static bool idle_counter_exceeded(struct cache_set *c) +{ + int counter, dev_nr; + + /* + * If c->idle_counter is overflow (idel for really long time), + * reset as 0 and not set maximum rate this time for code + * simplicity. + */ + counter = atomic_inc_return(&c->idle_counter); + if (counter <= 0) { + atomic_set(&c->idle_counter, 0); + return false; + } + + dev_nr = atomic_read(&c->attached_dev_nr); + if (dev_nr == 0) + return false; + + /* + * c->idle_counter is increased by writeback thread of all + * attached backing devices, in order to represent a rough + * time period, counter should be divided by dev_nr. + * Otherwise the idle time cannot be larger with more backing + * device attached. + * The following calculation equals to checking + * (counter / dev_nr) < (dev_nr * 6) + */ + if (counter < (dev_nr * dev_nr * 6)) + return false; + + return true; +} + +/* + * Idle_counter is increased every time when update_writeback_rate() is + * called. If all backing devices attached to the same cache set have + * identical dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds values, it is about 6 + * rounds of update_writeback_rate() on each backing device before + * c->at_max_writeback_rate is set to 1, and then max wrteback rate set + * to each dc->writeback_rate.rate. + * In order to avoid extra locking cost for counting exact dirty cached + * devices number, c->attached_dev_nr is used to calculate the idle + * throushold. It might be bigger if not all cached device are in write- + * back mode, but it still works well with limited extra rounds of + * update_writeback_rate(). + */ static bool set_at_max_writeback_rate(struct cache_set *c, struct cached_dev *dc) { @@ -167,21 +214,8 @@ static bool set_at_max_writeback_rate(struct cache_set *c, /* Don't set max writeback rate if gc is running */ if (!c->gc_mark_valid) return false; - /* - * Idle_counter is increased everytime when update_writeback_rate() is - * called. If all backing devices attached to the same cache set have - * identical dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds values, it is about 6 - * rounds of update_writeback_rate() on each backing device before - * c->at_max_writeback_rate is set to 1, and then max wrteback rate set - * to each dc->writeback_rate.rate. - * In order to avoid extra locking cost for counting exact dirty cached - * devices number, c->attached_dev_nr is used to calculate the idle - * throushold. It might be bigger if not all cached device are in write- - * back mode, but it still works well with limited extra rounds of - * update_writeback_rate(). - */ - if (atomic_inc_return(&c->idle_counter) < - atomic_read(&c->attached_dev_nr) * 6) + + if (!idle_counter_exceeded(c)) return false; if (atomic_read(&c->at_max_writeback_rate) != 1) @@ -195,13 +229,10 @@ static bool set_at_max_writeback_rate(struct cache_set *c, dc->writeback_rate_change = 0; /* - * Check c->idle_counter and c->at_max_writeback_rate agagain in case - * new I/O arrives during before set_at_max_writeback_rate() returns. - * Then the writeback rate is set to 1, and its new value should be - * decided via __update_writeback_rate(). + * In case new I/O arrives during before + * set_at_max_writeback_rate() returns. */ - if ((atomic_read(&c->idle_counter) < - atomic_read(&c->attached_dev_nr) * 6) || + if (!idle_counter_exceeded(c) || !atomic_read(&c->at_max_writeback_rate)) return false; -- 2.35.1