Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Li kunyu <kunyu@nfschina.com>
To:     skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Cc:     kunyu@nfschina.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, ray.huang@amd.com, shuah@kernel.org,
        trenn@suse.com
Subject: 
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:49:10 +0800
Message-Id: <20221013014911.2682-1-kunyu@nfschina.com>
In-Reply-To: <14d690a4-d2d5-01db-b2a2-e3c87b4a6394@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <14d690a4-d2d5-01db-b2a2-e3c87b4a6394@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


I'm glad to get your reply. In previous tests, it was found that variable initialization and assignment use mov related instructions. Therefore, when I analyze the code and find that removing some variable initialization and assignment does not affect the function and security, I will try to remove variable initialization.

Find the malloc function and find that its return value is void * type, so it does not need to cast.

thanks,
kunyu