Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762626AbXF0Q0h (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:26:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758274AbXF0Q03 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:26:29 -0400 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:42257 "EHLO mailhub.stusta.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758225AbXF0Q02 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:26:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:26:50 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Chuck Ebbert Cc: Al Boldi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please release a stable kernel Linux 3.0 Message-ID: <20070627162650.GP1094@stusta.de> References: <200706271653.58870.a1426z@gawab.com> <20070627155254.GO1094@stusta.de> <46828B6C.6010203@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46828B6C.6010203@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2463 Lines: 61 On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:08:12PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On 06/27/2007 11:52 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 04:53:58PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote: > >> Al Viro wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:18:36AM +0200, Zolt?n HUBERT wrote: > >>>> And as I understand it, this is (was ?) the whole point of > >>>> stable/development kernels. "We" can trust a newer stable > >>>> kernel to be a drop-in replacement for an older stable > >>>> kernel (from the same series), while development kernels > >>>> need time to stabilise with the new whizz-bang-pfouit stuff > >>>> that you all so nicely add. > >>> "Drop-in" in which sense? That out-of-tree modules keep working? > >>> Not really... > >> Al, be reasonable. There are many out-of-tree GPL modules that won't be > >> accepted into mainline, never mind those that shouldn't be accepted. But > >> these modules do have a right to not be obsoleted by constant API changes. > > > > "have a right" are strong words. > > Who is granting them this right? > > > >> You are effectively inhibiting the development of an out-of-tree GPL module > >> pool, by constantly pulling the rug under that community. > >> > >> Do you think this is fair? > > > > Why are these modules not submitted for inclusion into the kernel? > > > > I was trying to figure that out for this one: > > http://code.ximeta.com/trac-ndas > > No mention of ever trying to get this upstream AFAICT... but this is > interesting: > > The linux market is limited comparing that of MS Windows. > it is very hard for us to support the various linux distros. > we, Ximeta, are trying to support those requests as many as > we can, though the resources are very limited. One of their module contains a 180 kB binary blob and MODULE_LICENSE("Proprietary, Send bug reports to support@ximeta.com"). And it calls tons of functions EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed by their other 3 modules that are MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL")... cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/