Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 13:58:30 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, will@kernel.org,
        shuah@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 15/46] kselftest/arm64: Allow larger buffers
 in get_signal_context()
Message-ID: <Y0hRxpVqigP4amOD@sashalap>
References: <20221011145015.1622882-1-sashal@kernel.org>
 <20221011145015.1622882-15-sashal@kernel.org>
 <Y0WGCuHDriRctkeL@sirena.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y0WGCuHDriRctkeL@sirena.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 04:04:42PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 10:49:43AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 38150a6204c731a4846786682e500d132571fd82 ]
>>
>> In order to allow testing of signal contexts that overflow the base signal
>> frame allow callers to pass the buffer size for the user context into
>> get_signal_context(). No functional change.
>
>This doesn't obviously make sense independently, even by the relaxed
>standards stable uses these days?

I can drop this one, or, are there maybe additional patches we do want
to take?

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha