Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        =?UTF-8?q?S=C3=B6nke=20Huster?= <shuster@seemoo.tu-darmstadt.de>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6.0 26/34] wifi: cfg80211: avoid nontransmitted BSS list corruption
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 19:53:04 +0200
Message-Id: <20221013175147.193301522@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20221013175146.507746257@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20221013175146.507746257@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.67
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

commit bcca852027e5878aec911a347407ecc88d6fff7f upstream.

If a non-transmitted BSS shares enough information (both
SSID and BSSID!) with another non-transmitted BSS of a
different AP, then we can find and update it, and then
try to add it to the non-transmitted BSS list. We do a
search for it on the transmitted BSS, but if it's not
there (but belongs to another transmitted BSS), the list
gets corrupted.

Since this is an erroneous situation, simply fail the
list insertion in this case and free the non-transmitted
BSS.

This fixes CVE-2022-42721.

Reported-by: Sönke Huster <shuster@seemoo.tu-darmstadt.de>
Tested-by: Sönke Huster <shuster@seemoo.tu-darmstadt.de>
Fixes: 0b8fb8235be8 ("cfg80211: Parsing of Multiple BSSID information in scanning")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/wireless/scan.c |    9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

--- a/net/wireless/scan.c
+++ b/net/wireless/scan.c
@@ -423,6 +423,15 @@ cfg80211_add_nontrans_list(struct cfg802
 
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
+	/*
+	 * This is a bit weird - it's not on the list, but already on another
+	 * one! The only way that could happen is if there's some BSSID/SSID
+	 * shared by multiple APs in their multi-BSSID profiles, potentially
+	 * with hidden SSID mixed in ... ignore it.
+	 */
+	if (!list_empty(&nontrans_bss->nontrans_list))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	/* add to the list */
 	list_add_tail(&nontrans_bss->nontrans_list, &trans_bss->nontrans_list);
 	return 0;