Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761752AbXF0UmQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:42:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757235AbXF0UmF (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:42:05 -0400 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([209.217.80.40]:41145 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754309AbXF0UmE (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:42:04 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] balance parenthesis in serial core From: David Woodhouse To: Andrew Morton Cc: Mariusz Kozlowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070627133717.d19d82c9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <200706271030.l5RAUgKE015163@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <200706272222.01300.m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> <20070627133717.d19d82c9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:42:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1182976958.19006.50.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 (2.10.2-2.fc7.dwmw2.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by canuck.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 629 Lines: 18 On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 13:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Thanks. so... why shouldn't we just remove the buggy&&unused > RELEVANT_CFLAG defines?? I was just about to suggest that. I originally intended to use them for the obvious purpose, but then realised that we can just rely on the integers i_speed and o_speed instead. Do you want a replacement/incremental patch? -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/