Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To:     kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc:     kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ajones@ventanamicro.com,
        pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
        oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, peterx@redhat.com,
        maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com, ricarkol@google.com,
        zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Probe memory slots for once
Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:19:11 +0800
Message-Id: <20221014071914.227134-4-gshan@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221014071914.227134-1-gshan@redhat.com>
References: <20221014071914.227134-1-gshan@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

prepare_vm() is called in every iteration and run. The allowed memory
slots (KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS) are probed for multiple times. It's not
free and unnecessary.

Move the probing logic for the allowed memory slots to parse_args()
for once, which is upper layer of prepare_vm().

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 29 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
index dcb492b3f27b..d5aa9148f96f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
@@ -245,27 +245,17 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots,
 		       void *guest_code, uint64_t mempages,
 		       struct timespec *slot_runtime)
 {
-	uint32_t max_mem_slots;
 	uint64_t rempages;
 	uint64_t guest_addr;
 	uint32_t slot;
 	struct timespec tstart;
 	struct sync_area *sync;
 
-	max_mem_slots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS);
-	TEST_ASSERT(max_mem_slots > 1,
-		    "KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 1");
-	TEST_ASSERT(nslots > 1 || nslots == -1,
-		    "Slot count cap should be greater than 1");
-	if (nslots != -1)
-		max_mem_slots = min(max_mem_slots, (uint32_t)nslots);
-	pr_info_v("Allowed number of memory slots: %"PRIu32"\n", max_mem_slots);
-
 	TEST_ASSERT(mempages > 1,
 		    "Can't test without any memory");
 
 	data->npages = mempages;
-	data->nslots = max_mem_slots - 1;
+	data->nslots = nslots;
 	data->pages_per_slot = mempages / data->nslots;
 	if (!data->pages_per_slot) {
 		*maxslots = mempages + 1;
@@ -885,8 +875,8 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[],
 			break;
 		case 's':
 			targs->nslots = atoi(optarg);
-			if (targs->nslots <= 0 && targs->nslots != -1) {
-				pr_info("Slot count cap has to be positive or -1 for no cap\n");
+			if (targs->nslots <= 1 && targs->nslots != -1) {
+				pr_info("Slot count cap must be larger than 1 or -1 for no cap\n");
 				return false;
 			}
 			break;
@@ -932,6 +922,19 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[],
 		return false;
 	}
 
+	/* Memory slot 0 is reserved */
+	if (targs->nslots == -1) {
+		targs->nslots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS) - 1;
+		if (targs->nslots < 1) {
+			pr_info("KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 1\n");
+			return false;
+		}
+	} else {
+		targs->nslots--;
+	}
+
+	pr_info_v("Number of memory slots: %d\n", targs->nslots);
+
 	return true;
 }
 
-- 
2.23.0