Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <58855ea9-0d89-e17d-349a-657512068663@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 09:50:42 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.3.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] platform/x86/intel: pmc/core: Add Raptor Lake
 support to pmc core driver
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     markgross@kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        David Box <david.e.box@intel.com>
References: <20220912233307.409954-1-gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com>
 <20220912233307.409954-2-gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com>
 <3537fa63-9015-c63d-2321-a77062e24d6f@redhat.com>
From:   Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <3537fa63-9015-c63d-2321-a77062e24d6f@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 19. 09. 22, 13:41, Hans de Goede wrote:

> On 9/13/22 00:33, Gayatri Kammela wrote:
>> Add Raptor Lake client parts (both RPL and RPL_S) support to pmc core
>> driver. Raptor Lake client parts reuse all the Alder Lake PCH IPs.
>>
>> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>
>> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: David Box <david.e.box@intel.com>
>> Acked-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com>
>> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> 1) Added a dependency patch- ea902bcc1943f7539200ec464de3f54335588774 :
>>   "x86/cpu: Add new Raptor Lake CPU model number".
>> 2) Rebased the above patch on v6.0-rc1 with "Acked-by" from Hans and
>>   Rajneesh.
> 
> I still cannot take this, since patch 1/2 is *already merged* through
> another tree, so me cherry-picking it leads to potential conflicts.
> 
> As I have already explained twice you need to submit this upstream
> throuh the same tree which has the original merge of patch 1/2.

Hi, friendly ping: has this ever happened, Gayatri?

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs