Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <a90c28df-eb54-f20a-13a5-9ee4172f870e@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:54:13 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.2
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: x86/pmu: Stop adding speculative Intel GP
 PMCs that don't exist yet
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
References: <20220919091008.60695-1-likexu@tencent.com>
 <Y0CAHch5UR2Lp0tU@google.com>
From:   Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Y0CAHch5UR2Lp0tU@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 8/10/2022 3:38 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Does this need Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org?  Or is this benign enough that we don't
> care?

Considering stable kernel may access IA32_OVERCLOCKING_STATUS as well,
cc stable list helps to remove the illusion of pmu msr scope for stable tree 
maintainers.

> 
> No need for a v4, the above nits can be handled when applying.

Thanks, so kind of you.

> 
>> Suggested-by: Jim Mattson<jmattson@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Like Xu<likexu@tencent.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson<jmattson@google.com>
>> ---
> In the future, please provide a cover letter even for trivial series, it helps
> (me at least) mentally organize patches.

Roger that.

> 
> Thanks!
>