Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp334444rwi; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 02:43:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5Xa0Y7GZywmwsY5ea+DWPv/Vf5YbeDNEuVvZYuyd+jTZXvAuR4J/Pj8VeftV44AgifCG08 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7290:b0:78d:ec20:fe4d with SMTP id dt16-20020a170907729000b0078dec20fe4dmr2985237ejc.528.1665740605541; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 02:43:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1665740605; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aH+sKb6Ut8G3262OKN3T8n9i86QpWb4jfpjLAQ1/pcaenvjkm4SLFgH1uC9R6QZ3Hm 83kmd/u8WA3jWcM0vjGjsk6qjx7ujhBt5RCULfasgiJSFyOn+C0Cna5PvKujKN3wWDRv ZVh+6/dTmiTGAKKn+iPQfMCerPCyexeRjgE95JrcQiEVlA1zXya01o2cwgI1MsFuuGJo dhNCHY5DzbiYeR138o36KuE1MDcYcp6cW4KHHPXxnwOHuCupL1azf4Zs5Vsn5SwUByN3 +MIdLOiA65K+/fAr23wHMW+y9Nso7k84I7SnJjxD1swK0ZoJDCLvgu8FnKCj1xqyM51r 990A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=noszrcTN3Pcktpz+NXmnuYu516+WGFnZnyfZ/+hIE/U=; b=EA+26zQ9AUI0HpuvBto+x1vLu6V4zccdM52BdK9ORa3cm/WKcmL/o9BU3YKGqhnABw 75E4qBP74aw3Q1lR1VKgmD3iiRy/5tXpDWQ/REqdxingd2tfQ8pFP3Q+vramHGgt+/6r BnJXoX+XV+OkqXy7FzgOBfAW/9NmJTaHtX1E0bLIc60o+zpAUMBVoaxEYnUuiZ+DfweX o8mpIiyy4+AvHgVF5JdDNFRAyV2od1acwQczVWXHxOccNKkIQE+fe0W1KCSA2ELZjGnN g1XKFM8wmvtQngXtrSKPKFAFER4KK/SdJ4Qiwr5/xor6wTdzRCxzq3b2fIVsxWS0YZuz n8qw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t20-20020a1709066bd400b0078c80f5d81asi1804913ejs.52.2022.10.14.02.43.00; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 02:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230070AbiJNJRM (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 05:17:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58942 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229513AbiJNJRK (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 05:17:10 -0400 Received: from smtpout1.mo528.mail-out.ovh.net (smtpout1.mo528.mail-out.ovh.net [46.105.34.251]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8672AF1A6; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 02:17:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pro2.mail.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.4.248]) by mo528.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74978130870B3; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:17:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.41] (88.161.25.233) by DAG1EX1.emp2.local (172.16.2.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.12; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:17:06 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:17:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] devres: provide devm_krealloc_array() Content-Language: en-US To: Andy Shevchenko , Bartosz Golaszewski CC: , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20221007145641.3307075-1-jjhiblot@traphandler.com> <20221007145641.3307075-2-jjhiblot@traphandler.com> From: Jean-Jacques Hiblot In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [88.161.25.233] X-ClientProxiedBy: CAS4.emp2.local (172.16.1.4) To DAG1EX1.emp2.local (172.16.2.1) X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 2959709381908183515 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeekvddgudegucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgihesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheplfgvrghnqdflrggtqhhuvghsucfjihgslhhothcuoehjjhhhihgslhhothesthhrrghphhgrnhgulhgvrhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieejfedukeevudfghfetudevhffhhfekjeeiudegtdehueevgfdvgeeivdeifedvnecukfhppeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdekkedrudeiuddrvdehrddvfeefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepuddvjedrtddrtddruddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeojhhjhhhisghlohhtsehtrhgrphhhrghnughlvghrrdgtohhmqedpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddprhgtphhtthhopegrnhguhidrshhhvghvtghhvghnkhhosehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdgsrhhglhessghguggvvhdrphhlpdhlvggvrdhjohhnvghssehlihhnrghrohdrohhrghdpphgrvhgvlhesuhgtfidrtgiipdhrohgshhdoughtsehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdpshhvvghnrdhstghhfigvrhhmvghrseguihhsrhhuphhtihhvvgdqthgvtghhnhholhhoghhivghsrdgtohhmpdhkrhiihihsiihtohhfrdhkohiilhhofihskh hiodgutheslhhinhgrrhhordhorhhgpdhjohhhrghnodhlihhnrghroheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhmrghrihhjnhdrshhuihhjthgvnhesshhomhgrihhnlhhinhgvrdhorhhgpdgsjhhorhhnrdgrnhguvghrshhsohhnsehlihhnrghrohdrohhrghdpjhgrtggvkhdrrghnrghsiigvfihskhhisehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhlihhnuhigqdhlvggushesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdpuggvvhhitggvthhrvggvsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhlihhnuhigqdhkvghrnhgvlhesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdpoffvtefjohhsthepmhhohedvkedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhht X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/10/2022 18:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> { >> return devm_kmalloc_array(dev, n, size, flags | __GFP_ZERO); >> } > Missed blank line? There is no blank line after the definitions of devm_kzalloc(), devm_kmalloc_array() and devm_kcalloc() defined just above. > >> +static inline void *devm_krealloc_array(struct device *dev, >> + void *p, >> + size_t new_n, >> + size_t new_size, >> + gfp_t flags) >> +{ >> + size_t bytes; >> + >> + if (unlikely(check_mul_overflow(new_n, new_size, &bytes))) >> + return NULL; > I'm not sure it is what we want, but I have read the man realloc and found this: > > ... reallocarray() fails safely in the case where the multiplication > would overflow. If such an overflow occurs, reallocarray() returns NULL, > sets errno to ENOMEM, and leaves the original block of memory > unchanged. > > So, perhaps you can add that this behaviour mimics reallocarray()? except for the errno part, that is what is does. I don't think we should use ERR_PTR in this case as the other allocation functions don't use it. > >> + return devm_krealloc(dev, p, bytes, flags); >> +} > ... > > All comments are minor, feel free to add > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko >