Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:16:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:16:16 -0500 Received: from smtp-rt-7.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.19.161]:384 "EHLO embelia.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:16:04 -0500 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Cc: , "David S. Miller" , , , Subject: Re: alpha bug in signal handling Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 22:15:50 +0100 Message-Id: <20011205211550.28098@smtp.wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <15374.35262.151232.521493@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <15374.35262.151232.521493@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >I think David (Mosberger, not Miller :) is right here, and in fact >this is also wrong on PPC at the moment. However, the worst case is >that the reschedule or signal delivery will get delayed until the next >interrupt on that cpu (max 1/HZ seconds). Since it is a pretty narrow >window for the race I think it would be hard to observe the effect of >the bug. Yup, I found that some time ago. I though I even fixed it while hacking on the return from exception path. The fix has probably been lost along with some of that experimental stuff I was doing at that time though, I remember you saying the problem wasn't that big. Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/