Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <3a0c7699-231b-9339-7195-9c7536474054@novek.ru>
Date:   Sat, 15 Oct 2022 02:35:52 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Subject: Re: bridge:fragmented packets dropped by bridge
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Vyacheslav Salnikov <snordicstr16@gmail.com>,
        netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org
References: <CACzz7uzbSVpLu8iqBYXTULr2aUW_9FDdkEVozK+r-BiM2rMukw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru>
In-Reply-To: <CACzz7uzbSVpLu8iqBYXTULr2aUW_9FDdkEVozK+r-BiM2rMukw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 07.10.2022 12:21, Vyacheslav Salnikov wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> I switched from kernel versions 4.9 to 5.15 and found that the MTU on
> the interfaces in the bridge does not change.
> For example:
> I have the following bridge:
> bridge      interface
> br0          sw1
>                 sw2
>                 sw3
> 
> And I change with ifconfig MTU.
> I see that br0 sw1..sw3 has changed MTU from 1500 -> 1982.
> 
> But if i send a ping through these interfaces, I get 1500(I added
> prints for output)
> I investigated the code and found the reason:
> The following commit came in the new kernel:
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/ac6627a28dbfb5d96736544a00c3938fa7ea6dfb
> 
> And the behavior of the MTU setting has changed:
>>
>> Kernel 4.9:
>> if (net->ipv4.sysctl_ip_fwd_use_pmtu ||
>>     ip_mtu_locked(dst) ||
>>     !forwarding)  <--- True
>> return dst_mtu(dst) <--- 1982
>>
>>
>> / 'forwarding = true' case should always honour route mtu /
>> mtu = dst_metric_raw(dst, RTAX_MTU);
>> if (mtu)
>> return mtu;
> 
> 
> 
> Kernel 5.15:
>>
>> if (READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_ip_fwd_use_pmtu) ||
>>     ip_mtu_locked(dst) ||
>>     !forwarding) { <--- True
>> mtu = rt->rt_pmtu;  <--- 0
>> if (mtu && time_before(jiffies, rt->dst.expires)) <-- False
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> / 'forwarding = true' case should always honour route mtu /
>> mtu = dst_metric_raw(dst, RTAX_MTU); <---- 1500
>> if (mtu) <--- True
>> goto out;
> 
> As I see from the code in the end takes mtu from br_dst_default_metrics
>> static const u32 br_dst_default_metrics[RTAX_MAX] = {
>> [RTAX_MTU - 1] = 1500,
>> };
> 
> Why is rt_pmtu now used instead of dst_mtu?
> Why is forwarding = False called with dst_metric_raw?
> Maybe we should add processing when mtu = rt->rt_pmtu == 0?
> Could this be an error?
> 

Can you share kernel configs for both versions? Actually only one config value
is needed - CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER.

It will help me investigate the issue.

> 
> I found a thread discussing a similar problem. It suggested porting
> the next patch:
> Signed-off-by: Rundong Ge <rdong.ge@gmail.com>
> ---
>   include/net/ip.h | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/ip.h b/include/net/ip.h
> index 29d89de..0512de3 100644
> --- a/include/net/ip.h
> +++ b/include/net/ip.h
> @@ -450,6 +450,8 @@ static inline unsigned int
> ip_dst_mtu_maybe_forward(const struct dst_entry *dst,
>   static inline unsigned int ip_skb_dst_mtu(struct sock *sk,
>      const struct sk_buff *skb)
>   {
> + if ((skb_dst(skb)->flags & DST_FAKE_RTABLE) && skb->dev)
> + return min(skb->dev->mtu, IP_MAX_MTU);
>    if (!sk || !sk_fullsock(sk) || ip_sk_use_pmtu(sk)) {
>    bool forwarding = IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_FORWARDED;
> 
> 
> Why was this patch not accepted in the end?