Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764422AbXF1Iis (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2007 04:38:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762599AbXF1Iil (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2007 04:38:41 -0400 Received: from 81-174-11-161.static.ngi.it ([81.174.11.161]:40249 "EHLO mail.enneenne.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762346AbXF1Iik (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2007 04:38:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:40:03 +0200 From: Rodolfo Giometti To: David Woodhouse Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Message-ID: <20070628084003.GQ13886@enneenne.com> References: <20070627101449.GH13886@enneenne.com> <1182939510.6409.17.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20070627125802.GI13886@enneenne.com> <1182960660.1170.12.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20070627174537.GM13886@enneenne.com> <1182966588.1170.28.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20070627224623.GO13886@enneenne.com> <1183018133.1170.46.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20070628081538.GP13886@enneenne.com> <1183019474.1170.66.camel@pmac.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1183019474.1170.66.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Organization: GNU/Linux Device Drivers, Embedded Systems and Courses X-PGP-Key: gpg --keyserver keyserver.linux.it --recv-keys D25A5633 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.32.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: giometti@enneenne.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.enneenne.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1561 Lines: 41 On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:31:14AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 10:15 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > > Do you think I should add these functions into my patch, even if I > > cannot test it, or it's enought providing just the > > compat_sys_time_pps_fetch() function? > > Probably best to put them in. That way, you make it easier for people to Mmm... so I should provide new syscalls for _all_ architectures... gulp! :) It could be acceptable, just for the first release, to provide the support for x86 only? In this manner we can have a first release of LinuxPPS in the main line just for x86 and then me, or other people, may add support for the several supported architectures. > test. Ideally, you should also provide a simple program that other > people can use to test it, preferably without needing hardware (or at > least just a nullmodem cable and another test program at the other end > of it). I already have a basic testing program... I can add it into Documentation/pps directory, can't I? Ciao, Rodolfo -- GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com Linux Device Driver giometti@gnudd.com Embedded Systems giometti@linux.it UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/