Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221011180142.2742289-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
 <20221011180142.2742289-2-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20221014142127.GE4221@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
 <20221014144019.GB1108603@lothringen> <20221014150344.GG4221@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
 <CAEXW_YQoRUJ=0_GJG6JunR58yASmehPanp14zbR3Y+KAGL1TDA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20221014154606.GJ4221@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20221014204750.GA1119620@lothringen>
 <20221016151655.GA5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
In-Reply-To: <20221016151655.GA5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date:   Sun, 16 Oct 2022 11:56:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YSHN=OWhSu3=Qr+SCeo+=HOHmj3=votKXPmTk0Us2SpdA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/13] rcu: Fix missing nocb gp wake on rcu_barrier()
To:     paulmck@kernel.org
Cc:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com,
        urezki@gmail.com, neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        youssefesmat@google.com, surenb@google.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 11:16 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:47:50PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 08:46:06AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 11:19:28AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > > I agree with the discussion, though if all CBs are in the bypass list,
> > > > the patch will also save 2 jiffies.
> > > >
> > > > So just commit messages that need rework then? This one can be taken instead:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/21ECDA9F-81B1-4D22-8B03-020FB5DADA4F@joelfernandes.org/T/#m14d21fbce23539a521693a4184b28ddc55d7d2c5
> > >
> > > This one looks plausible to me.
> >
> > With the following modified diff (passed 25 hours of TREE01):
>
> Very good!
>
> Could one of you (presumably Joel) please send v9?
>
> Just to avoid me getting the wrong patch in the wrong place or similar.
> Or mangling the required rebase following a pull (otherwise, as soon as I
> create branches, Stephen Rothwell notes the lack of a committer signoff.)

Taking a break from raking leaves so doing it right now! Those leaves!

 - Joel