Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp3817396rwi; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 19:16:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6vbojRX3UHT8wK5btdMqt6JqEcu1uRXJUoO5ArRLGY0M1y2JhbWf8Fz7oqr8fN11o+nYHR X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:75f5:b0:78d:fc53:7d96 with SMTP id jz21-20020a17090775f500b0078dfc537d96mr6878214ejc.718.1665972997862; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 19:16:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1665972997; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tLZSA+jniaWu1ZKbKgkByAVs8FbArFqmkCerqgbea9gix6BNobSjF4aVsI2sHv5Mh/ 2J/TTgDARmvDiWent0mQhZhiciphmoRNmvqsPj53pB480A54bN5tJJORsXKyvGWtftW3 t325VUyvkkXjL4VXsnfwX4HJQIP9pCGro7BFnK+XNg90/N1kPMxHk9OwAXPFk3YJ2A3m mPYCtecnXibz+BpK1u9T5nK6u48+m2r2+85N2hImEh76ljBGRuIS1IGgv7kYzyfYhF5s 0WXPoRgHkGaH1+is2VNx9OIHLGgaSAE2tr0oB7tHvmglZjMAKLrRAgkkp8POrS1rFU9D oGew== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=uKanzW/VwDYGlwmtj3P1eCv4AASwkrW5OeVn27zLGbc=; b=TzaHh4k6pVP5TsYHkEdy7YIcYW/vAffx/xt5D08z/OCNo5Q93yUJb9/aoaXWBEV/o5 KTozvEd3i0AB9fqinMrJm8g/Orf02Ae8uTJohSKLhn8eVM/WcRuvItwYKknVZTeSetNv g14D5JQebFhHc+xqfhH8nyqygJQFKXGY/j8bI2s5P9Mm6tbsGmTDTst0yo2ydZNxXs81 DxVvq2KnOuCR43GmqOLiEojuFZzDO6tMU2yFdNiQFAak9FSGeDIPpCuCRn/LQD/KrDZv TyDkeAXYOp8PWULO6ok0iN0bYgGOwnr0MhOJXSHhSJIx7oJWxzJf+EI2L+bXQiPvo9AF LmDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id st11-20020a170907c08b00b0078e1d20b9dcsi6282158ejc.916.2022.10.16.19.16.12; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 19:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230112AbiJQCAi (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 16 Oct 2022 22:00:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58184 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230024AbiJQCAU (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2022 22:00:20 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 238E326101; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 19:00:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MrKrN4WlhzJnTs; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 09:57:40 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.174.178.129) by kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 10:00:16 +0800 From: Kemeng Shi To: , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH 5/8] blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 10:00:08 +0800 Message-ID: <20221017020011.25016-6-shikemeng@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20221017020011.25016-1-shikemeng@huawei.com> References: <20221017020011.25016-1-shikemeng@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.174.178.129] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org There is no iocg_pd_init function. The pd_alloc_fn function pointer of iocost policy is set with ioc_pd_init. Just correct it. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi --- block/blk-iocost.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c index 761295ed9c5a..96c1571a8a1d 100644 --- a/block/blk-iocost.c +++ b/block/blk-iocost.c @@ -2880,7 +2880,7 @@ static int blk_iocost_init(struct gendisk *disk) spin_unlock_irq(&ioc->lock); /* - * rqos must be added before activation to allow iocg_pd_init() to + * rqos must be added before activation to allow ioc_pd_init() to * lookup the ioc from q. This means that the rqos methods may get * called before policy activation completion, can't assume that the * target bio has an iocg associated and need to test for NULL iocg. -- 2.30.0