Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp3949722rwi; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 22:14:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5SCYfkBQYVUlGf2X8s0XbiiRZvQi1OPit2Rt7c5cjgGBEVnzROmGMBHeEY3v8aYHnXkNE2 X-Received: by 2002:a63:fd4f:0:b0:45f:d7ef:9f94 with SMTP id m15-20020a63fd4f000000b0045fd7ef9f94mr9508331pgj.137.1665983681275; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 22:14:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1665983681; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xYM6iHlN2vstPbDu19oV5oXZkIaCUsXDlPoByiUM0QDcFwoIB5vVSCkpWOTShM+ZZb 2+C6gKuujIxKpnUTGOtLhlH52iZFfPdDAW/hCF0VZzvcoOdoIq+i4AqNcg254d0ILM1V 2P2nuktXp8PywjXa51WztbdT3oTsvA+z/VbVI55byoAlL3QUWbIv4/nigDnadUCceODx C+/9u2dbwjIk/TULj6xsmLFNQJyRrs6k3LAegKGGN99Kkf2V+KZ3ZndFZSTKeTEasJoq BmuvHrxnvWk+Cy21hcu+BfriGw7jctZTHq41cqXKjFFc1yI04nBIJtrFcjs/ihj8OqFF MuTw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=1pkUG8SB3NXfjwmJffISRFNjCCZaK7tUK5ZqdyRYa2w=; b=hAtRpOXBom2/9/AJEyj3oWuB0qIluThP9R+DvZjeB+8a5nJPsKNs/cy95yYhgmwbeN HFzJ6O3tfR0cK+POnOQEXBMLXFe79Ill/v2tOt4TuPEThEvTBqgP6kUA3PIAmM1JLUKd cNeZNBxRsXmuiO49i6KTDREgBzhm4pJ3U075FSfy9SN+OdYNAoU2ffh3QD4pw3EudiVV 59rY7eMQvFJ7u7ghBo5j1aIb2NQgTpzvXdf443xnfZnh5/i+OUOSoBkBSR3rAC73Pser xe1X8lBejMYjrSq5JlsaEnXREankO2rhPHUFM2ortQOxdUA/LlBnoTHnOm8jQ1ushBW7 b8/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=MXGGmPfJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bc11-20020a656d8b000000b0042af7555d10si10141162pgb.862.2022.10.16.22.14.28; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 22:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=MXGGmPfJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229916AbiJQE6G (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:58:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47540 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229508AbiJQE6D (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:58:03 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EEC74F66E for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:58:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id l4so9737709plb.8 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:58:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1pkUG8SB3NXfjwmJffISRFNjCCZaK7tUK5ZqdyRYa2w=; b=MXGGmPfJSRlNTRXe0jVUtuRaDsOm/6WhkDCeF1vMLMwdNl4nNhEHpxZFCui3VT8lro +gcA1u9SyWr0LhAI2cQRXm0npYhIdBYO0z4+dKIx6mlSb0Q1Utz25ON8JdUNvsowuDDb WEyrZG64c9pQFsUZHRFMEaq7yrx3pmZE+ft4A= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=1pkUG8SB3NXfjwmJffISRFNjCCZaK7tUK5ZqdyRYa2w=; b=aPLGdZ3cximRHWz2zcaUeley4h59jqa8KRw7yfozgRdvmyTIE1eQcD3OLY5bB67Dmw 7eZFZhySw3xFVrkCuXrvdCN/1Ek2hFBsEljYTU0LkZ0iKzZRqymBAEQxP1qJy3HZDK8Y IQdPQYj8zqlFoOYfTE3rdAAkTRSjhmAkLSYvqdD0OgoDuzlg5jFVjTrQN3bekco2bGZn yg1G8xPkhuwqe6yccE92bPqnNH7CdSAzEb/KcX7/QgzSuLr6+LYw4c4sxhJdHVHRnU2l fzX//2kQiOJB7+7GKEF9hed66Y4UM1Vczj4QGDxhjonL189TH7LMva/rlGvdiTx5awxd Z2HA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0nYOqZO34tdYBngqx98SU9HwmivhImk8TQNd5+N/rOAgpT9XOQ VwgkGhlssi9i4VpsTtPad2Gx5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f706:b0:184:7a4c:fdd0 with SMTP id h6-20020a170902f70600b001847a4cfdd0mr10178998plo.98.1665982681673; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d17-20020a170903231100b00178b070416asm5676810plh.36.2022.10.16.21.58.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:57:59 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: 6.1rc1: NFS memcpy warning on mount Message-ID: <202210162144.76FBC7271@keescook> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 10:58:21PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > [ 19.617475] memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 28) of single field "request.sap" at fs/nfs/super.c:857 (size 18446744073709551615) I've sent this, which should fix it: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221017043107.never.457-kees@kernel.org/ However, the -1 size tells me something has gone slightly wrong with the runtime warning, as it _should_ be ignoring destinations with "unknown" size -- in this case, struct sockaddr has a trailing array, which is treated (currently) as a fake flexible array, so __builtin_object_size() is reporting the "-1". But with the coming -fstrict-flex-arrays, this will need fixing anyway. I will re-check the runtime warning logic... -- Kees Cook