Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Rui Li <me@lirui.org>, Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>,
        Yanteng Si <siyanteng@loongson.cn>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] docs/zh_CN: Add userspace-api/index and ebpf
 Chinese translation
In-Reply-To: <b75832fc-67bb-22b9-39b3-c0816b7ca254@lirui.org>
References: <cover.1666009558.git.me@lirui.org>
 <87pmeqftfw.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
 <b75832fc-67bb-22b9-39b3-c0816b7ca254@lirui.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2022 08:13:35 -0600
Message-ID: <87h702fshc.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Rui Li <me@lirui.org> writes:

> So sorry if disturbing. After sending the first patch set, a
> maintainer contacted me and pointed out my email server
> is incorrectly handling DKIM and Message-Id. That causes
> inconvenience for maintainers to review.
>
> I changed my email service and hopefully the DKIM check
> and Message ID won't be wrong. I am not quite sure if I
> should resend or add PATCH v1 version.
>
> Sorry again if I disturbed anyone.

No worries, I was mostly wondering.

As a general rule, whenever you resend a patch series, it is good to add
a note saying why so that others don't have to try to figure it out on
their own.

Thanks,

jon