Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:09:49 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Cc:     outreachy@lists.linux.dev, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net,
        phil@philpotter.co.uk, paskripkin@gmail.com,
        linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com, saurabh.truth@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] staging: r8188eu: reformat long computation lines
Message-ID: <Y01iLXp20G0FSJFG@kroah.com>
References: <cover.1666011479.git.drv@mailo.com>
 <2dd27eff9aab5ffe31e61086c0584982794507cf.1666011479.git.drv@mailo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2dd27eff9aab5ffe31e61086c0584982794507cf.1666011479.git.drv@mailo.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 06:52:50PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> Reformat long running computation instructions to improve code readability.
> Address following checkpatch script complaints:
> 	CHECK: line length of 171 exceeds 100 columns
> 	CHECK: line length of 113 exceeds 100 columns
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> index 79daf8f269d6..427da7e8ba4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> @@ -211,8 +211,10 @@ static int __nat25_network_hash(unsigned char *network_addr)
>  	} else if (network_addr[0] == NAT25_IPX) {
>  		unsigned long x;
> 
> -		x = network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ network_addr[3] ^ network_addr[4] ^ network_addr[5] ^
> -			network_addr[6] ^ network_addr[7] ^ network_addr[8] ^ network_addr[9] ^ network_addr[10];
> +		x = network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ network_addr[3] ^

Why not go out to [4] here and then you are one line shorter?

> +		    network_addr[4] ^ network_addr[5] ^ network_addr[6] ^
> +		    network_addr[7] ^ network_addr[8] ^ network_addr[9] ^
> +		    network_addr[10];
> 
>  		return x & (NAT25_HASH_SIZE - 1);
>  	} else if (network_addr[0] == NAT25_APPLE) {
> @@ -224,16 +226,20 @@ static int __nat25_network_hash(unsigned char *network_addr)
>  	} else if (network_addr[0] == NAT25_PPPOE) {
>  		unsigned long x;
> 
> -		x = network_addr[0] ^ network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ network_addr[3] ^ network_addr[4] ^ network_addr[5] ^ network_addr[6] ^ network_addr[7] ^ network_addr[8];
> +		x = network_addr[0] ^ network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^
> +		    network_addr[3] ^ network_addr[4] ^ network_addr[5] ^

Same here


> +		    network_addr[6] ^ network_addr[7] ^ network_addr[8];
> 
>  		return x & (NAT25_HASH_SIZE - 1);
>  	} else if (network_addr[0] == NAT25_IPV6) {
>  		unsigned long x;
> 
> -		x = network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ network_addr[3] ^ network_addr[4] ^ network_addr[5] ^
> -			network_addr[6] ^ network_addr[7] ^ network_addr[8] ^ network_addr[9] ^ network_addr[10] ^
> -			network_addr[11] ^ network_addr[12] ^ network_addr[13] ^ network_addr[14] ^ network_addr[15] ^
> -			network_addr[16];
> +		x = network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ network_addr[3] ^
> +		    network_addr[4] ^ network_addr[5] ^ network_addr[6] ^
> +		    network_addr[7] ^ network_addr[8] ^ network_addr[9] ^
> +		    network_addr[10] ^ network_addr[11] ^ network_addr[12] ^
> +		    network_addr[13] ^ network_addr[14] ^ network_addr[15] ^
> +		    network_addr[16];

And here.

thanks,

greg k-h