Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp5040612rwi; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:40:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4dD/RJ/EE3/llIerXestpIbtH11EN/L254CAGhGFYzcgOjecnHjJZQAv8+n9WryGOnQEN6 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:b12:b0:45d:4f99:6156 with SMTP id bm18-20020a0564020b1200b0045d4f996156mr12165429edb.219.1666042810949; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:40:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1666042810; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tmfKiL1li2hDejb5YnFxKjYrO1lpepRaNjcoaRzR443auvuSZeSSVtOJx7QmhO9lCl 4ihFRtv08l23HGuLF7E+0E//3y/Ml952Xrtg/fK7bcOc0nE6pRt4e7xWwBMYJe/6xvZO Dvaifcr2CfrFDTDXscsnZtYZ6ktn2Ju9wjRYEnzBLR4m7nsWEYg7YEYtoAuLmXJvCPTL WVWqxIKMEhYcBoQ74HWpnO+s9XkDwzgjDedaEgC/o3b3Hu8LKJAleZU9tt3ZkMn91x5p gfutR+ULDjC5opko6KFF0ifQBKhWYH3euEIRFX6tB1B6BVtWgcHE0x0voytyDNIiXXwB tFDw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject :from:references:cc:to:content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id; bh=D32cLtajSSiRsdWz9N/FRI7wr9etF95TCUXbUyvLaic=; b=g4/W3TPQ9NNGNfEDk+ZdggebIZefApb1iJIrSGQz2feG3b+OqJ2AkpMeYDDM9j1l7e 7BL/Mw1OI+kGMyD8zg6IBNXd1PO6ONnVmguSWZNM3Oe+gQSE+7RVoBxH0Tq7Xfg2YuFu /NT+Fo6oR4jkHOTvKLplsNsWALRRkhq7vioKEcUaez7sQ+U/+ugYxA77feogLS+9Z7Dp Yxe9QN5JU21nzTMYxC1GvkyGFsWRqGY0+Ts6+gJejf5AbmDBTeKT/7ft8Tt8QX+CXTpz LOIuvfHc597VnyoB0b4P3kKpOU2MjpXJrsbXjiSrMUNN6MSB2cEi1JVGorb6FoC66q9f JDDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hb30-20020a170907161e00b0077077ded253si11345053ejc.924.2022.10.17.14.39.46; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230378AbiJQVcO (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:32:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44190 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229780AbiJQVcM (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:32:12 -0400 Received: from vps-vb.mhejs.net (vps-vb.mhejs.net [37.28.154.113]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D428013F3B; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MUA by vps-vb.mhejs.net with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1okXiN-0001oB-9u; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 23:32:03 +0200 Message-ID: <3eecebca-a526-d10a-02d3-496ce919d577@maciej.szmigiero.name> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 23:31:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.0 Content-Language: en-US, pl-PL To: Gavin Shan Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ajones@ventanamicro.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, peterx@redhat.com, ricarkol@google.com, zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev References: <20221014071914.227134-1-gshan@redhat.com> <20221014071914.227134-5-gshan@redhat.com> From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Support variable guest page size In-Reply-To: <20221014071914.227134-5-gshan@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14.10.2022 09:19, Gavin Shan wrote: > The test case is obviously broken on aarch64 because non-4KB guest > page size is supported. The guest page size on aarch64 could be 4KB, > 16KB or 64KB. > > This supports variable guest page size, mostly for aarch64. > > - The host determines the guest page size when virtual machine is > created. The value is also passed to guest through the synchronization > area. > > - The number of guest pages are unknown until the virtual machine > is to be created. So all the related macros are dropped. Instead, > their values are dynamically calculated based on the guest page > size. > > - The static checks on memory sizes and pages becomes dependent > on guest page size, which is unknown until the virtual machine > is about to be created. So all the static checks are converted > to dynamic checks, done in check_memory_sizes(). > > - As the address passed to madvise() should be aligned to host page, > the size of page chunk is automatically selected, other than one > page. > > - All other changes included in this patch are almost mechanical > replacing '4096' with 'guest_page_size'. > > Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan > --- > .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 191 +++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c > index d5aa9148f96f..d587bd952ff9 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c > @@ -26,14 +26,11 @@ > #include > > #define MEM_SIZE ((512U << 20) + 4096) > -#define MEM_SIZE_PAGES (MEM_SIZE / 4096) > #define MEM_GPA 0x10000000UL > #define MEM_AUX_GPA MEM_GPA > #define MEM_SYNC_GPA MEM_AUX_GPA > #define MEM_TEST_GPA (MEM_AUX_GPA + 4096) > #define MEM_TEST_SIZE (MEM_SIZE - 4096) > -static_assert(MEM_SIZE % 4096 == 0, "invalid mem size"); > -static_assert(MEM_TEST_SIZE % 4096 == 0, "invalid mem test size"); > > /* > * 32 MiB is max size that gets well over 100 iterations on 509 slots. > @@ -42,29 +39,16 @@ static_assert(MEM_TEST_SIZE % 4096 == 0, "invalid mem test size"); > * limited resolution). > */ > #define MEM_SIZE_MAP ((32U << 20) + 4096) > -#define MEM_SIZE_MAP_PAGES (MEM_SIZE_MAP / 4096) > #define MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE (MEM_SIZE_MAP - 4096) > -#define MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE_PAGES (MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE / 4096) > -static_assert(MEM_SIZE_MAP % 4096 == 0, "invalid map test region size"); > -static_assert(MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE % 4096 == 0, "invalid map test region size"); > -static_assert(MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE_PAGES % 2 == 0, "invalid map test region size"); > -static_assert(MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE_PAGES > 2, "invalid map test region size"); > > /* > * 128 MiB is min size that fills 32k slots with at least one page in each > * while at the same time gets 100+ iterations in such test > + * > + * 2 MiB chunk size like a typical huge page > */ > #define MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE (128U << 20) > -#define MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE_PAGES (MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE / 4096) > -/* 2 MiB chunk size like a typical huge page */ > -#define MEM_TEST_UNMAP_CHUNK_PAGES (2U << (20 - 12)) > -static_assert(MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE <= MEM_TEST_SIZE, > - "invalid unmap test region size"); > -static_assert(MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE % 4096 == 0, > - "invalid unmap test region size"); > -static_assert(MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE_PAGES % > - (2 * MEM_TEST_UNMAP_CHUNK_PAGES) == 0, > - "invalid unmap test region size"); > +#define MEM_TEST_UNMAP_CHUNK_SIZE (2U << 20) > > /* > * For the move active test the middle of the test area is placed on > @@ -77,8 +61,7 @@ static_assert(MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE_PAGES % > * for the total size of 25 pages. > * Hence, the maximum size here is 50 pages. > */ > -#define MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE_PAGES (50) > -#define MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE (MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE_PAGES * 4096) > +#define MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE 0x32000 The above number seems less readable than an explicit value of 50 pages. In addition to that, it's 50 pages only with 4k page size, so at least the comment above needs to be updated to reflect this fact. > #define MEM_TEST_MOVE_GPA_DEST (MEM_GPA + MEM_SIZE) > static_assert(MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE <= MEM_TEST_SIZE, > "invalid move test region size"); (...) > @@ -242,33 +229,34 @@ static struct vm_data *alloc_vm(void) > } > > static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, > - void *guest_code, uint64_t mempages, > + void *guest_code, uint64_t mem_size, > struct timespec *slot_runtime) > { > - uint64_t rempages; > + uint64_t mempages, rempages; > uint64_t guest_addr; > - uint32_t slot; > + uint32_t slot, guest_page_size; > struct timespec tstart; > struct sync_area *sync; > > - TEST_ASSERT(mempages > 1, > - "Can't test without any memory"); > + guest_page_size = vm_guest_mode_params[VM_MODE_DEFAULT].page_size; > + mempages = mem_size / guest_page_size; > + > + data->vm = __vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&data->vcpu, mempages, guest_code); > + ucall_init(data->vm, NULL); > TEST_ASSERT(data->vm->page_size == guest_page_size, "Invalid VM page size") here would catch the case if someone accidentally modifies __vm_create_with_one_vcpu() to use other page size than specified for VM_MODE_DEFAULT. > data->npages = mempages; > + TEST_ASSERT(data->npages > 1, "Can't test without any memory"); > data->nslots = nslots; > - data->pages_per_slot = mempages / data->nslots; > + data->pages_per_slot = data->npages / data->nslots; > if (!data->pages_per_slot) { > - *maxslots = mempages + 1; > + *maxslots = data->npages + 1; > return false; > } > > - rempages = mempages % data->nslots; > + rempages = data->npages % data->nslots; > data->hva_slots = malloc(sizeof(*data->hva_slots) * data->nslots); > TEST_ASSERT(data->hva_slots, "malloc() fail"); > > - data->vm = __vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&data->vcpu, mempages, guest_code); > - ucall_init(data->vm, NULL); > - > pr_info_v("Adding slots 1..%i, each slot with %"PRIu64" pages + %"PRIu64" extra pages last\n", > data->nslots, data->pages_per_slot, rempages); > (...) > @@ -856,6 +863,35 @@ static void help(char *name, struct test_args *targs) > pr_info("%d: %s\n", ctr, tests[ctr].name); > } > > +static bool check_memory_sizes(void) > +{ > + uint32_t guest_page_size = vm_guest_mode_params[VM_MODE_DEFAULT].page_size; > + > + if (MEM_SIZE % guest_page_size || > + MEM_TEST_SIZE % guest_page_size) { > + pr_info("invalid MEM_SIZE or MEM_TEST_SIZE\n"); > + return false; > + } > + > + if (MEM_SIZE_MAP % guest_page_size || > + MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE % guest_page_size || > + (MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE / guest_page_size) <= 2 || > + (MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE / guest_page_size) % 2) { > + pr_info("invalid MEM_SIZE_MAP or MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE\n"); > + return false; > + } > + > + if (MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE > MEM_TEST_SIZE || > + MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE % guest_page_size || > + (MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE / guest_page_size) % > + (MEM_TEST_UNMAP_CHUNK_SIZE / guest_page_size)) { This should be (MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE / guest_page_size) % (2 * MEM_TEST_UNMAP_CHUNK_SIZE / guest_page_size)) to match the old static_assert(). Thanks, Maciej