Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2022 02:03:27 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.1-rc1
Message-ID: <Y03tTxLdH7HezRI+@zx2c4.com>
References: <CAHk-=wj6y5fipM2A5kEuOO9qm5PBzUY=-m9viEahhtxT09KR_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20221017123434.GA1062543@roeck-us.net>
 <CAHk-=wh9o1x43Me0kRZAwN-DmZzUgJzUhA2_v+Uo0Aq04hB_=A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wh9o1x43Me0kRZAwN-DmZzUgJzUhA2_v+Uo0Aq04hB_=A@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:39:08AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 5:35 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> >
> > Build results:
> >         total: 152 pass: 152 fail: 0
> > Qemu test results:
> >         total: 490 pass: 420 fail: 70
> 
> Strange. You claim zero build failures, but then:
> 
> > Build failures
> >
> > Building riscv:defconfig ... failed
> 
> so I think your stats may be wrong somehow ;)
> 
> > mips, sparc64
> > -------------
> >
> > All big endian mips tests fail to reset after boot. The problem is
> > caused by commit 72a95859728a ("mfd: syscon: Remove repetition of the
> > regmap_get_val_endian()").
> 
> Bah. I had already archived that whole thread as "sorted out", but
> yeah, the revert clearly never made it to me for rc1.
> 
> But it should be in the regmap queue (Lee/Andy?), so it is hopefully
> just a temporary thing.
> 
> In fact, it looks like all the failures have known fixes. So here's
> hoping that your list will be a whole lot cleaner by rc2.
> 
> Knock wood.

I emailed Lee about it 3 days ago, hoping it'd make rc1 too, but never
heard back. Maybe vacation? Dunno.

Jason

> 
> Thanks,
>            Linus