Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <cef4dea2-9892-971f-5dbc-62eaac478d62@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2022 22:04:04 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.4.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: add samsung,starqltechn board
 based on sdm845 chip
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20221012185411.1282838-1-dsankouski@gmail.com>
 <20221012185411.1282838-2-dsankouski@gmail.com>
 <99652775-8921-9d4a-193e-20d1487e6759@linaro.org>
 <CABTCjFDDEhNo0OVk+87kU93xwvXNR3tMuinfLXzZ6PeyweCpag@mail.gmail.com>
 <8c773f11-1c00-1856-daa7-250a4ec37d23@linaro.org>
 <CABTCjFAajiT7QpyA9mG7i4XzWxtLsvRsDLPtWTvwmJbMYEr1SQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABTCjFAajiT7QpyA9mG7i4XzWxtLsvRsDLPtWTvwmJbMYEr1SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 17/10/2022 04:02, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote:
>>> I've been told it's easier for maintainers to resend all patch series,
>>> even if only 1 patch from the series requires change. So I decided to
>>> keep versions equal in all patches, to clearly indicate those patches
>>> are from the same series. Please, correct me if I'm wrong.
>>
>> This is okay, but you wrote here there was a v1 and v2, and you changed
>> nothing against it. If there was v1 and v2, we would ack it, I think.
>>
>> Or this changelog is for some other patch? Not for this one?
> There's no previous versions of this patch, since it was born in the
> v3 patch series. The empty changelog for this patch indicates that
> there's no point to look for previous versions. I think I'll do it
> differently next time to avoid confusion - just a sentence that vN is
> the start version for patch.

Yes, please. Something like:

Changes for v3: New patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof