Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2022 07:13:37 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Dan Vacura <w36195@motorola.com>
Cc:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>,
        Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
        Jeff Vanhoof <qjv001@motorola.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
        Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de>,
        Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: uvc: fix dropped frame after missed isoc
Message-ID: <Y042AZ2iA05no5U5@kroah.com>
References: <20221017205446.523796-1-w36195@motorola.com>
 <20221017205446.523796-2-w36195@motorola.com>
 <f7029f41-4f8c-9ba7-3e3b-268a743998d5@gmail.com>
 <Y04MT0+jKApYFfcG@p1g3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y04MT0+jKApYFfcG@p1g3>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 09:15:43PM -0500, Dan Vacura wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 08:50:03AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > On 10/18/22 03:54, Dan Vacura wrote:
> > > With the re-use of the previous completion status in 0d1c407b1a749
> > > ("usb: dwc3: gadget: Return proper request status") it could be possible
> > > that the next frame would also get dropped if the current frame has a
> > > missed isoc error. Ensure that an interrupt is requested for the start
> > > of a new frame.
> > > 
> > 
> > Shouldn't the subject line says [PATCH v3 1/6]?
> 
> Yes. Clerical error on my side not updating this after resolving a
> check-patch error... Not sure if it matters as this patch can exist on
> it's own. Or if I can send this again with fixed subject line, but that
> may confuse others, since there's no code difference.

Our tools (b4) will complain it can not find patch 1 in the series, so
yes, please resend with them properly numbered so that we can find them
all when going to apply them to the tree.

thanks,

greg k-h