Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To:     <jejb@linux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>, <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
CC:     <hare@suse.de>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
        <ipylypiv@google.com>, <changyuanl@google.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/7] scsi: pm8001: Remove pm8001_tag_init()
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2022 19:16:00 +0800
Message-ID: <1666091763-11023-5-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <1666091763-11023-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
References: <1666091763-11023-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

From: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@google.com>

In commit 5a141315ed7c ("scsi: pm80xx: Increase the number of outstanding
I/O supported to 1024") the pm8001_ha->tags allocation was moved into
pm8001_init_ccb_tag(). This changed the execution order of allocation.
pm8001_tag_init() used to be called after the pm8001_ha->tags allocation
and now it is called before the allocation.

Before:

pm8001_pci_probe()
`--> pm8001_pci_alloc()
     `--> pm8001_alloc()
          `--> pm8001_ha->tags = kzalloc(...)
          `--> pm8001_tag_init(pm8001_ha); // OK: tags are allocated

After:

pm8001_pci_probe()
`--> pm8001_pci_alloc()
|    `--> pm8001_alloc()
|         `--> pm8001_tag_init(pm8001_ha); // NOK: tags are not allocated
|
`--> pm8001_init_ccb_tag()
     `-->  pm8001_ha->tags = kzalloc(...) // today it is bitmap_zalloc()

Since pm8001_ha->tags_num is zero when pm8001_tag_init() is called it does
nothing. Tags memory is allocated with bitmap_zalloc() so there is no need
to manually clear each bit with pm8001_tag_free().

Reviewed-by: Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
---
 drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c | 2 --
 drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c  | 7 -------
 drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h  | 1 -
 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
index 2ff2fac1e403..040a8280f23b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
@@ -436,8 +436,6 @@ static int pm8001_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
 		atomic_set(&pm8001_ha->devices[i].running_req, 0);
 	}
 	pm8001_ha->flags = PM8001F_INIT_TIME;
-	/* Initialize tags */
-	pm8001_tag_init(pm8001_ha);
 	return 0;
 
 err_out_nodev:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
index 51230b827149..c9fa3328f3fa 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
@@ -96,13 +96,6 @@ int pm8001_tag_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 *tag_out)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-void pm8001_tag_init(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
-{
-	int i;
-	for (i = 0; i < pm8001_ha->tags_num; ++i)
-		pm8001_tag_free(pm8001_ha, i);
-}
-
 /**
  * pm8001_mem_alloc - allocate memory for pm8001.
  * @pdev: pci device.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
index 16a753d5e8a7..ecb98bc5a8d0 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
@@ -632,7 +632,6 @@ extern struct workqueue_struct *pm8001_wq;
 
 /******************** function prototype *********************/
 int pm8001_tag_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 *tag_out);
-void pm8001_tag_init(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha);
 u32 pm8001_get_ncq_tag(struct sas_task *task, u32 *tag);
 void pm8001_ccb_task_free(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
 			  struct pm8001_ccb_info *ccb);
-- 
2.35.3