Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp5919798rwi; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:03:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6AsqQthI4v4UEWpfkDvg8fXDhxXh83BaUAURiP3po8mSS+cwuSSsdzBEc7W72s8/O1Dp57 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1e4b:b0:20d:8cf0:1a3c with SMTP id pi11-20020a17090b1e4b00b0020d8cf01a3cmr3572592pjb.172.1666098220533; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:03:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1666098220; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nBGRc/C9KpcgNekL4qnrDRI47vSjxcro/2R9Uu+ppYMhbhqiuhpGfxQlPYTLa8Jd/Y NjXuM/b3fKHX40R2Jrr41szl9e4aaChhExeIWtWbmol7kRwz2GohfARIMvGEmqsh5lZI Ib7St9JTbptcwPj5S+CJPJzRlVXUna7cmRbAntU43zf2GnfiiAndR+lX40+NrJDDANeX ur2DtqT9lUf2Z9A+UnQLfq+bcwkKxUso3YivGeeyuhEfGa7yzMQv2H1OfBE0zrWWXbca Sj2hshqxIXWbeSEe5RoYlvpQj3QGRt4gkYl4j+BVfcJ/eKlDmi+hf00TUm340AxQZf6H o6Gg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=KZI+xF2v45TYGNY11GhjRI7Bm4OESA+H1oD8ggmtTNE=; b=stkQYdCzigatLhL2UhVI0E9rtXMvNX4111paowmxfpkjAOfrgZm49QdXC+enC8ZNO6 zvd6m+aH+TMMrSrkdIP+N4zCV/8c9P1b9krhQmMs5bdEoGhepGFgBzO+HEm7YS04Szt+ X091wtAvqeLcB1dXA1w0/euormXLenJwmQw2rzT6ZIxD/yT6/fvqr0JhRAhJIyUd3Evo /y+7dgSz85Ger/hAPAQvyR4b9BSk6aEpGZhaMUeudD7ilFORdZ5bIBMbupBlJfvaMmDJ KzUzA4p17oAQwaqSv/5ppCnv5YqZYTxzbknlYgK+hHjLf7Kif57TBpkw5YlQ7h8ETN4r 8+cw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g9-20020a17090a9b8900b0020ac8a8f40dsi13596967pjp.81.2022.10.18.06.03.09; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230053AbiJRMT4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:19:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57228 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229966AbiJRMTn (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:19:43 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A600613E8C; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 05:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MsCXX1Ps9zJn3H; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:17:00 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.174.178.129) by kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:19:37 +0800 From: Kemeng Shi To: , , CC: , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:19:32 +0800 Message-ID: <20221018121932.10792-6-shikemeng@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20221018121932.10792-1-shikemeng@huawei.com> References: <20221018121932.10792-1-shikemeng@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.174.178.129] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org There is no iocg_pd_init function. The pd_alloc_fn function pointer of iocost policy is set with ioc_pd_init. Just correct it. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi Acked-by: Tejun Heo --- block/blk-iocost.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c index 761295ed9c5a..96c1571a8a1d 100644 --- a/block/blk-iocost.c +++ b/block/blk-iocost.c @@ -2880,7 +2880,7 @@ static int blk_iocost_init(struct gendisk *disk) spin_unlock_irq(&ioc->lock); /* - * rqos must be added before activation to allow iocg_pd_init() to + * rqos must be added before activation to allow ioc_pd_init() to * lookup the ioc from q. This means that the rqos methods may get * called before policy activation completion, can't assume that the * target bio has an iocg associated and need to test for NULL iocg. -- 2.30.0