Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp428511rwi; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:31:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4yZPBCISgCtgXemwJY0V1YbLt9iPc1LyQfOuQqO97Nnc+pambzgRVR7RS4Zwagy9vuHhDD X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7b94:b0:731:1b11:c241 with SMTP id ne20-20020a1709077b9400b007311b11c241mr5056384ejc.676.1666150269543; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:31:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1666150269; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=shcCni/6mhNZEw98j4i7f2u0zo2J2Ve25MkibYIrvULTXu32BQRgGeRbNhRA9t751Q XkMc0RMTbfNPj47qQZzH4n2BDD3hKy4BwSEXS3T4mwIgTqJ7xUMd9U/2TWMToN3Vj7j1 q+P71ZBtor+ettQUESirVGJy2ZSsGBz1FA+JiK6biihvKWiLMrSZnw0AwMVi69/+e5EQ OqneWTnUBHXMF2HCXwf+aTfz9wWqRHH76W7Nv59sIobB3Rcx/iu3pC2AvRZ62oaXfajl Koyw2qwCFeeJWIJ9dRZZ52bdgTc4YX5YR8XOhba28+wQmOoTHY+RsNRgz2pp73nbuK4u FUzg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=NTGG/cvt/sXtcO4vw7jW1SwiHCVcWPXiw8ERqfwV02o=; b=WMAqpyMF1vyH2Eczg5o7Rq0GS1U87pQBIIo8xjAs+DziVzYbyePI53Y018nC4EiKSV UpHOW1OJhgx2zE6dAdDPjH+3iUBMIy86fg7bmvUMvBFTzx7KKxSHrme3fU3XaqAr9NxJ qqP8vy/ImsLQrDvw2460+VHaAcL81+Cwcstj4mkYKzZkMGMiYkGJDMMg+BiFmT/IfL9f SFg5llujxKDx0l46FB99KrMg0h1ixhnZarneFIajOt35O6CTTwWZpiOXdY7jEk/Bu4ct 7xkQnpi26OFTZ6ZNu2KBwu4Am8NFuTYFNQDPoxYgAkMTdJCoANh+ViND/JQYsTK014rI tVbQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i6-20020a170906114600b007824b741e7asi11250764eja.236.2022.10.18.20.30.42; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229909AbiJSDOO (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 23:14:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44430 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229732AbiJSDOG (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 23:14:06 -0400 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 189DE165A8; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:14:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MsbPF2ZQTzl7wh; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 11:12:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.127.227]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgDnLS53a09jvmtUAA--.10775S6; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 11:14:00 +0800 (CST) From: Ye Bin To: axboe@kernel.dk, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yebin@huaweicloud.com, Ye Bin Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] blktrace: fix possible memleak in '__blk_trace_remove' Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 11:36:01 +0800 Message-Id: <20221019033602.752383-3-yebin@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20221019033602.752383-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> References: <20221019033602.752383-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgDnLS53a09jvmtUAA--.10775S6 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxXw4ruFy7KF4rKrWxGry8Krg_yoW5WryxpF 48Xrs0kw48ZF40g3yv9r1fXry8t34Yy3y5JF9xuw4rtr98tryYgFnF9ryqvFW5AFW8KFWf Ar1rZr1jyr4UWa7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU9v14x267AKxVWrJVCq3wAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWUJVWUGwAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2048vs2IY020E87I2jVAFwI0_Jryl82xGYIkIc2 x26xkF7I0E14v26r4j6ryUM28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0 Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr1j6rxdM2 8EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AI xVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20x vE14v26r106r15McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xv r2IYc2Ij64vIr41lF7I21c0EjII2zVCS5cI20VAGYxC7MxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s 026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_ JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUAVWUtwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14 v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xva j40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8JV W8JrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7VUjJKsUUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: p1hex046kxt4xhlfz01xgou0bp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ye Bin When test as follows: step1: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESETUP, &arg) step2: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESTART, NULL) step3: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACETEARDOWN, NULL) step4: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESETUP, &arg) Got issue as follows: debugfs: File 'dropped' in directory 'sda' already present! debugfs: File 'msg' in directory 'sda' already present! debugfs: File 'trace0' in directory 'sda' already present! And also find syzkaller report issue like "KASAN: use-after-free Read in relay_switch_subbuf" "https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=13849f0d9b1b818b087341691be6cc3ac6a6bfb7" If remove block trace without stop(BLKTRACESTOP) block trace, '__blk_trace_remove' will just set 'q->blk_trace' with NULL. However, debugfs file isn't removed, so will report file already present when call BLKTRACESETUP. static int __blk_trace_remove(struct request_queue *q) { struct blk_trace *bt; bt = rcu_replace_pointer(q->blk_trace, NULL, lockdep_is_held(&q->debugfs_mutex)); if (!bt) return -EINVAL; if (bt->trace_state != Blktrace_running) blk_trace_cleanup(q, bt); return 0; } If do test as follows: step1: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESETUP, &arg) step2: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACESTART, NULL) step3: ioctl(sda, BLKTRACETEARDOWN, NULL) step4: remove sda There will remove debugfs directory which will remove recursively all file under directory. >> blk_release_queue >> debugfs_remove_recursive(q->debugfs_dir) So all files which created in 'do_blk_trace_setup' are removed, and 'dentry->d_inode' is NULL. But 'q->blk_trace' is still in 'running_trace_lock', 'trace_note_tsk' will traverse 'running_trace_lock' all nodes. >>trace_note_tsk >> trace_note >> relay_reserve >> relay_switch_subbuf >> d_inode(buf->dentry)->i_size To solve above issues, reference commit '5afedf670caf', call 'blk_trace_cleanup' unconditionally in '__blk_trace_remove' and first stop block trace in 'blk_trace_cleanup'. Signed-off-by: Ye Bin --- kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c index 50b6f241b5f7..e17bba027a2c 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c @@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ static int blk_trace_stop(struct blk_trace *bt) static void blk_trace_cleanup(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_trace *bt) { + blk_trace_stop(bt); synchronize_rcu(); blk_trace_free(q, bt); put_probe_ref(); @@ -393,8 +394,7 @@ static int __blk_trace_remove(struct request_queue *q) if (!bt) return -EINVAL; - if (bt->trace_state != Blktrace_running) - blk_trace_cleanup(q, bt); + blk_trace_cleanup(q, bt); return 0; } -- 2.31.1