Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:06:35 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: v5.19 & v6.0 stable backport request
Message-ID: <Y0+h++6NReFAZhrv@kroah.com>
References: <87k04xiedr.fsf@intel.com>
 <Y0+fex0i0vmBL6QX@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y0+fex0i0vmBL6QX@kroah.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 08:55:55AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 02:02:08PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > 
> > Hello stable team, please backport these two commits to stable kernels
> > v5.19 and v6.0:
> > 
> > 4e78d6023c15 ("drm/i915/bios: Validate fp_timing terminator presence")
> 
> Does not apply to 5.19.y, can you provide a working backport?
> 
> > d3a7051841f0 ("drm/i915/bios: Use hardcoded fp_timing size for generating LFP data pointers")
> 
> Queued up to both trees now, thanks.

No, wait, that breaks the build!

How did you test this?  I'm dropping both of these now.

Please resubmit a set of tested patches if you wish to have them applied
to the tree.  These were obviously not even attempted, which just wastes
all of our time :(

greg k-h