Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934039AbXF2ST5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:19:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753309AbXF2STs (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:19:48 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:58092 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751385AbXF2STq (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:19:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:24:20 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Chuck Ebbert , Michal Piotrowski , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , LKML , Rodrigo Luiz , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai , Jaroslav Kysela , Ben Collins , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, "Vladimir V. Saveliev" , Randy Dunlap , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, David Chinner , Tejun Heo , Rodney Gordon II Subject: Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2 Message-ID: <20070629192420.0d501a93@the-village.bc.nu> In-Reply-To: <46854B29.80906@garzik.org> References: <46852187.3080504@googlemail.com> <20070629175920.6af0c62b@the-village.bc.nu> <468543CE.6080401@redhat.com> <20070629190602.4ef6a0cb@the-village.bc.nu> <46854B29.80906@garzik.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.8; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1019 Lines: 28 On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:10:49 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > >>> I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ > >>> storm > >> Why does the driver report "irq 0"? > >> > >> ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd ctl bmdma irq 0 <==== > >> > >> Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20 > > > > Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ > > values wrongly ? > > AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ. Please point out examples where it > remains broken... 2.6.22-rc6 it is broken, for all the systems I've looked at, as are the port numbers. Tejun posted fixes for the IRQ but they do not seem to have been applied, or if they were it was post -rc6 to a git tree. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/