Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 18:42:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 18:42:29 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:55044 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 18:42:20 -0500 Subject: Re: ext3-0.9.16 against linux-2.4.17-pre2 From: Robert Love To: Andrew Morton Cc: "ext3-users@redhat.com" , lkml In-Reply-To: <3C0B12C5.F8F05016@zip.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3C0B12C5.F8F05016@zip.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 05 Dec 2001 18:42:19 -0500 Message-Id: <1007595740.818.2.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 00:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > An ext3 update which also applies to linux-2.4.16 is available at > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/ > > Quite a lot of miscellany here. It would be appreciated if interested > parties could please test it in preparation for sending upstream. Thanks. Running 2.4.17-pre4 + preempt-kernel + ext3-0.9.16. System survived a preliminary stress test, involving I/O and VM pressure, with no problems. Seems solid here. Also, subjectively the combination of 2.4.17-pre2+ and this ext3 patch yields better performance under load. Can't comment which provide the benefit without testing, but hey, it's the user experience that counts. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/