Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
        Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6.0 119/862] btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO flags handling
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:23:26 +0200
Message-Id: <20221019083255.205949482@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20221019083249.951566199@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20221019083249.951566199@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.67
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

commit 81d5d61454c365718655cfc87d8200c84e25d596 upstream.

Currently there are two corner cases not handling compat RO flags
correctly:

- Remount
  We can still mount the fs RO with compat RO flags, then remount it RW.
  We should not allow any write into a fs with unsupported RO flags.

- Still try to search block group items
  In fact, behavior/on-disk format change to extent tree should not
  need a full incompat flag.

  And since we can ensure fs with unsupported RO flags never got any
  writes (with above case fixed), then we can even skip block group
  items search at mount time.

This patch will enhance the unsupported RO compat flags by:

- Reject read-write remount if there are unsupported RO compat flags

- Go dummy block group items directly for unsupported RO compat flags
  In fact, only changes to chunk/subvolume/root/csum trees should go
  incompat flags.

The latter part should allow future change to extent tree to be compat
RO flags.

Thus this patch also needs to be backported to all stable trees.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/block-group.c |   11 ++++++++++-
 fs/btrfs/super.c       |    9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -2190,7 +2190,16 @@ int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs
 	int need_clear = 0;
 	u64 cache_gen;
 
-	if (!root)
+	/*
+	 * Either no extent root (with ibadroots rescue option) or we have
+	 * unsupported RO options. The fs can never be mounted read-write, so no
+	 * need to waste time searching block group items.
+	 *
+	 * This also allows new extent tree related changes to be RO compat,
+	 * no need for a full incompat flag.
+	 */
+	if (!root || (btrfs_super_compat_ro_flags(info->super_copy) &
+		      ~BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SUPP))
 		return fill_dummy_bgs(info);
 
 	key.objectid = 0;
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -2112,6 +2112,15 @@ static int btrfs_remount(struct super_bl
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto restore;
 		}
+		if (btrfs_super_compat_ro_flags(fs_info->super_copy) &
+		    ~BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SUPP) {
+			btrfs_err(fs_info,
+		"can not remount read-write due to unsupported optional flags 0x%llx",
+				btrfs_super_compat_ro_flags(fs_info->super_copy) &
+				~BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SUPP);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto restore;
+		}
 		if (fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices == 0) {
 			ret = -EACCES;
 			goto restore;