Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp1179330rwi; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 07:35:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5igCj3IWt+ii6d4c8smzdyryvUfi0A/t8LC1J3kECSjmQtz6/KOd/b3cS2tzlNZm7RfCQm X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c40b:0:b0:45d:4492:a8cb with SMTP id j11-20020aa7c40b000000b0045d4492a8cbmr7664059edq.217.1666190102055; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 07:35:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1666190102; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kNBP72QNY58HLB6RmdPSf9biB7URazOK3lEnr+lpnc9XQ9ZuTWsFy/HevjyS651FCZ sj5VjKkVCIaRXHgMHb8dNxpzz4ul65TJju2/p0oWXy3VydbBJQwoYnyRh/kF45YKBR4E g39egQzCHPiedoyKwVZyDUfTFit1OhhvPMoFbJEBzuiwdsqUvUvP+jprOF6/IeinR/2L QPeaJ8BVxKmXUDq98pu4OAK10WzjSBzyGGhxtV7GetArlC1UZrEzuHCcdU+N3TXAToTM 4/GD2UcuUT2VogAT9TeER9zFl+wVS/TtqmULLGC7R8s0pGt3jChoNIHHwGWOwBCT2Yan nJrA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id :dkim-signature; bh=DVW03iTiTRTyayeqLUvLgu638TsI5iFPDEtu5YBUGdY=; b=ykd5ppvuFgDp0zu8icA7HHoJCyTyPQrsNYEFKztNJy6UVCf1pmCzoiw0Q776IwGsUa bCFXGu8M1kvlNhdZ+18/CQN8AcKMN/TSlL2K39JckOYiLS4P0CzBwvATpB2/zg/sCokS e5iYeF8oA0HX/Ef+QeEqGsbrhPwiBi2D6+f5h47gvNePcsH/NzGUwrpDy43GN/hkFCvn uBOOpWoj2NCVROVXTTEPUqPeF5QJlJ83OspnloGMUdbMdqEqlvS4FRBp6hCiloaeB3k6 IVTlud+0ppud476nhG1I/VT0rxc4UTSs8mAT1rv4UXAtU7/Db2mFtkIRzgpFkqGQtSIf sDTA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=LR2a5igE; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l10-20020a1709060e0a00b007317ad1f9a4si11762775eji.310.2022.10.19.07.34.36; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 07:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=LR2a5igE; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232638AbiJSNhs (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:37:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45304 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229552AbiJSNg6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:36:58 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9BBF12D813; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 06:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 29JDFgGV002967; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:24:10 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=DVW03iTiTRTyayeqLUvLgu638TsI5iFPDEtu5YBUGdY=; b=LR2a5igEdy+qgsweIHBHmRr+SHmak/XXDMlFKTePwJIjo2knWnb4bvSowhVkzi28O+xr 74kMGbDVXjlBomtcJsksgo+XnhOY2Po3JBLra0Hi7yN3QZoy6+uwG1uLiLxqi08l3WUU RZT8PpxmsiofZ4zNt5SJK2Fi2OaUo+RWoD0z5RBcCjpxJNw3//9XoNIaRMOYL7czwsvF qZBlgk2Rbzp3j0l9lrg4gjWaL7djHvL9/6asdRRtNfW12VvAbaO9tW8eJS3rttoaV0Qe baKTAcChWdOKP77Y6c0E9MQArG4FzD7l3NIumTtxSh5Gnap0Bb49Tn9LHxJZ/2IWS7oj oA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3kahyb0e48-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:24:09 +0000 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 29JDGL51006539; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:24:09 GMT Received: from ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (ba.79.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.121.186]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3kahyb0e3b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:24:08 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 29JDNoe1021140; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:24:08 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.18]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3k7mg9ny5h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:24:08 +0000 Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com ([9.208.128.133]) by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 29JDOAA461669648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:24:10 GMT Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90C758061; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:24:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC12158057; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:24:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sig-9-65-252-68.ibm.com (unknown [9.65.252.68]) by smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:24:05 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <7b6f01c201ce82f58c19a1e22df9333f30eedda5.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] ima: Move xattr hooks into LSM From: Mimi Zohar To: Christian Brauner , Kees Cook Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin , Paul Moore , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Borislav Petkov , Jonathan McDowell , Takashi Iwai , Petr Vorel , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micka=EBl_Sala=FCn?= , KP Singh , Casey Schaufler , John Johansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:24:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20221018150751.3qsbehcnli4c4g4o@wittgenstein> References: <20221013222702.never.990-kees@kernel.org> <20221013223654.659758-3-keescook@chromium.org> <20221018150751.3qsbehcnli4c4g4o@wittgenstein> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-18.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: qAO7TduTXm7UKdzpxb-rqCPH3_RjdJHr X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: xUE2GvXWPHkkknVG_aXO0rT3CK50EAdq X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.545,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-10-19_08,2022-10-19_02,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=659 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2209130000 definitions=main-2210190070 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 17:07 +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 03:36:48PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > Move the xattr IMA hooks into normal LSM layer. As with SELinux and > > Smack, handle calling cap_inode_setxattr() internally. > > > > Cc: Mimi Zohar > > Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin > > Cc: Paul Moore > > Cc: James Morris > > Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" > > Cc: Borislav Petkov > > Cc: Jonathan McDowell > > Cc: Takashi Iwai > > Cc: Petr Vorel > > Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > > --- > > I like that changes obviously but in general, does IMA depend on being > called _after_ all other LSMs or is this just a historical artifact? Calculating the EVM HMAC must be last, after the other security xattrs have been updated. -- thanks, Mimi