Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To:     andersson@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, rafael@kernel.org,
        robh+dt@kernel.org
Cc:     johan@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Remove un-necessary cpumask_empty() check
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 19:29:22 +0530
Message-Id: <20221019135925.366162-2-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20221019135925.366162-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
References: <20221019135925.366162-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

CPUFreq core will always set the "policy->cpus" bitmask with the bitfield
of the CPU that goes first per domain/policy. So there is no way the
"policy->cpus" bitmask will be empty during qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init().

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index d5ef3c66c762..a5b3b8d0e164 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -552,11 +552,6 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		data->per_core_dcvs = true;
 
 	qcom_get_related_cpus(index, policy->cpus);
-	if (cpumask_empty(policy->cpus)) {
-		dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d failed to get related CPUs\n", index);
-		ret = -ENOENT;
-		goto error;
-	}
 
 	policy->driver_data = data;
 	policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu = true;
-- 
2.25.1