Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756651AbXF2VCP (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:02:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753297AbXF2VB5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:01:57 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:60175 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754389AbXF2VBz (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:01:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4685733C.1090102@garzik.org> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:01:48 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Chuck Ebbert , Michal Piotrowski , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , LKML , Rodrigo Luiz , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai , Jaroslav Kysela , Ben Collins , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, "Vladimir V. Saveliev" , Randy Dunlap , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, David Chinner , Tejun Heo , Rodney Gordon II Subject: Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2 References: <46852187.3080504@googlemail.com> <20070629175920.6af0c62b@the-village.bc.nu> <468543CE.6080401@redhat.com> <20070629190602.4ef6a0cb@the-village.bc.nu> <46854B29.80906@garzik.org> <20070629192420.0d501a93@the-village.bc.nu> In-Reply-To: <20070629192420.0d501a93@the-village.bc.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.9 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1194 Lines: 34 Alan Cox wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:10:49 -0400 > Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> Alan Cox wrote: >>>>> I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ >>>>> storm >>>> Why does the driver report "irq 0"? >>>> >>>> ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd ctl bmdma irq 0 <==== >>>> >>>> Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20 >>> Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ >>> values wrongly ? >> AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ. Please point out examples where it >> remains broken... > > 2.6.22-rc6 it is broken, for all the systems I've looked at, as are the > port numbers. Tejun posted fixes for the IRQ but they do not seem to have > been applied, or if they were it was post -rc6 to a git tree. I've seen the patch that eventually became 22888423b3b1b96573250671afb5b72ea4364902 from Olof Johansson but nothing from Tejun on the subject. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/