Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:37:57 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     =?iso-8859-1?Q?Micka=EBl_Sala=FCn?= <mic@digikod.net>,
        Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] integrity: Prepare for having "ima" and "evm"
 available in "integrity" LSM
Message-ID: <202210191219.EEEA3E20C@keescook>
References: <20221013222702.never.990-kees@kernel.org>
 <20221013223654.659758-1-keescook@chromium.org>
 <08a8b202-69b4-e154-28f5-337a898acf61@digikod.net>
 <202210141050.A8DF7D10@keescook>
 <0d2b9d34-2eda-8aa6-d596-eb1899645192@digikod.net>
 <202210191129.BFBF8035@keescook>
 <2ce5e63dc4f15b8015fd7499120ff4256ad1f619.camel@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2ce5e63dc4f15b8015fd7499120ff4256ad1f619.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 03:13:34PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Most people were/are still using the "security=" boot command line
> option, not "lsm=".  This previously wasn't a problem with "security=",
> but became a problem with "lsm=".

How are people still using "security=" for IMA/EVM? It only interacts
with LSMs marked with LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR.

-- 
Kees Cook