Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756222AbXF3MEg (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:04:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753917AbXF3ME2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:04:28 -0400 Received: from mailgw1.fraunhofer.de ([153.96.1.18]:32886 "EHLO mailgw1.fraunhofer.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753536AbXF3ME1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:04:27 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:02:16 +0200 From: Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) To: w@1wt.eu Cc: schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, harald@skogtun.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, david@lang.hm Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Linux Kernel include files Message-ID: <46864648.xvPEouG+JEAn31tr%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <46826d62.lTsuVo9cC7wGjcjf%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <1182960282.1170.4.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <46838d16.ut8KQOMKsZ9HqPYT%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <1183027034.1170.104.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <46838ffd.bUYvs93vY6OX67Mk%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20070630112309.GA10245@1wt.eu> In-Reply-To: <20070630112309.GA10245@1wt.eu> User-Agent: nail 11.22 3/20/05 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jun 2007 12:04:17.0205 (UTC) FILETIME=[C88E3E50:01C7BB0E] X-Fraunhofer-Email-Policy: accepted Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1873 Lines: 42 Willy Tarreau wrote: > J?rg, > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:39:57PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:27 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > > David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > > By the way, your mailer seems to be sometimes omitting In-Reply-To: and > > > > > References: headers, which RFC2822 says you SHOULD include in replies. > > > > > > > > Sending such accusation without knowing the reason is not polite. > > > > > > It's not an accusation -- it's merely an observation. You may not have > > > noticed that your mailer was misbehaving; now you _do_ know, and if you > > > care about RFC compliance you might want to fix it. You're not _obliged_ > > > to fix it, of course. I just thought you'd like to know. > > > > Well there you are: my mailer is definitely NOT missbehaving. > > Please do not repeat similar accusations when not knowing the reason. > > Attacking people who suggest to you they *may* have noticed an anomaly is > not polite at all, childish at best, and counter-productive in any case. Well, then please write this to the person who did attack me for no reason! What he did is typical trollish behavior, as he tried to turn a technical based discussion into a flame war for no reason. J?rg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/