Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759189AbXF3Olc (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:41:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757380AbXF3OlY (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:41:24 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:59037 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756854AbXF3OlY (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:41:24 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Linux Kernel include files Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:41:12 +0100 Message-ID: References: <46826d62.lTsuVo9cC7wGjcjf%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <1182960282.1170.4.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <46838d16.ut8KQOMKsZ9HqPYT%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <1183027034.1170.104.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <46838ffd.bUYvs93vY6OX67Mk%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20070630112309.GA10245@1wt.eu> <46864648.xvPEouG+JEAn31tr%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: agrajag.inprovide.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.20 (Double Solitaire, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dBoHDbF5mIhASMa42gEIcDz6cBg= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2078 Lines: 48 Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) writes: > Willy Tarreau wrote: > >> J?rg, >> >> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:39:57PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: >> > David Woodhouse wrote: >> > >> > > On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:27 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: >> > > > David Woodhouse wrote: >> > > > > By the way, your mailer seems to be sometimes omitting >> > > > > In-Reply-To: and References: headers, which RFC2822 says >> > > > > you SHOULD include in replies. >> > > > >> > > > Sending such accusation without knowing the reason is not polite. >> > > >> > > It's not an accusation -- it's merely an observation. You may >> > > not have noticed that your mailer was misbehaving; now you _do_ >> > > know, and if you care about RFC compliance you might want to >> > > fix it. You're not _obliged_ to fix it, of course. I just >> > > thought you'd like to know. >> > >> > Well there you are: my mailer is definitely NOT missbehaving. >> > Please do not repeat similar accusations when not knowing the >> > reason. >> >> Attacking people who suggest to you they *may* have noticed an >> anomaly is not polite at all, childish at best, and >> counter-productive in any case. > > Well, then please write this to the person who did attack me for no > reason! > > What he did is typical trollish behavior, as he tried to turn a > technical based discussion into a flame war for no reason. Ah, it's nice to see J?rg back to his usual self. For a while there the headers discussion was looking almost reasonable. BTW J?rg, thanks for the absolutely fantastic real-life flame war you gave us at LinuxTag (by the Google booth, remember). I haven't had so much fun in a long time. Quite a few bystanders seemed rather entertained too. -- M?ns Rullg?rd mans@mansr.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/