Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221018145348.4051809-1-amit.pundir@linaro.org>
 <CAPDyKFoBMB9OMUrcoPCV0of1fj2dimEwPyHGW=ydjJ2M0ubM8Q@mail.gmail.com> <20221020093057.zrrvxlgghn27bpes@bogus>
In-Reply-To: <20221020093057.zrrvxlgghn27bpes@bogus>
From:   Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:38:23 +0530
Message-ID: <CAMi1Hd05PkEJcHqHpQX-X6B2oR4250_pHPjkd2-54JWgKsYx0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qrb5165-rb5: Disable cpuidle states
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@quicinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        dt <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 15:01, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:57:34PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 at 16:53, Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Disable cpuidle states for RB5. These cpuidle states
> > > made the device highly unstable and it runs into the
> > > following crash frequently:
> > >
> > > [    T1] vreg_l11c_3p3: failed to enable: -ETIMEDOUT
> > > [    T1] qcom-rpmh-regulator 18200000.rsc:pm8150l-rpmh-regulators: ldo11: devm_regulator_register() failed, ret=-110
> > > [    T1] qcom-rpmh-regulator: probe of 18200000.rsc:pm8150l-rpmh-regulators failed with error -110
> > >
> > > Fixes: 32bc936d7321 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Add cpuidle states")
> > > Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dts | 8 ++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dts
> > > index cc003535a3c5..f936c41bfbea 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dts
> > > @@ -251,6 +251,14 @@ qca639x: qca639x {
> > >
> > >  };
> > >
> > > +&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0 {
> > > +       status = "disabled";
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0 {
> > > +       status = "disabled";
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  &adsp {
> > >         status = "okay";
> > >         firmware-name = "qcom/sm8250/adsp.mbn";
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> >
> > Disabling the CPU idlestates, will revert us back to using only the WFI state.
> >
> > An option that probably works too is to just drop the idlestate for
> > the CPU cluster. Would you mind trying the below and see if that works
> > too?
> >
>
> Indeed this is was I suggested to check initially. But I was surprised to
> see IIUC, Amit just disabled CPU states with above change and got it working.
> So it is not cluster state alone causing the issue, is it somehow presence
> of both cpu and cluster states ? Am I missing something here.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi
> > index c32227ea40f9..c707a49e8001 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi
> > @@ -700,7 +700,6 @@ CPU_PD7: cpu7 {
> >
> >                 CLUSTER_PD: cpu-cluster0 {
> >                         #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> > -                       domain-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
>
> How about just marking CLUSTER_SLEEP_0 state disabled ? That looks cleaner
> than deleting this domain-idle-states property here. Also not sure if DTS
> warnings will appear if you delete this ?

Hi, I did try disabling CLUSTER_SLEEP_0: cluster-sleep-0 {} in
domain-idle-states {} but that didn't help. That's why I end up
disabling individual cpu states in idle-states {}.

Regards,
Amit Pundir


>
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep