Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754858AbXF3SLd (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:11:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752811AbXF3SLX (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:11:23 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:43383 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752552AbXF3SLW (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:11:22 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:10:58 -0400 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Matthew Garrett , =?UTF-8?B?VMO2csO2aw==?= Edvin , netdev@vger.kernel.org, power@bughost.org, zambrano@broadcom.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PM policy, hotplug, power saving (was Re: [PATCH] b44: power down PHY when interface down) Message-ID: <20070630141058.4c678c37@oldman> In-Reply-To: <468687DE.6030003@garzik.org> References: <4354d3270706300447ladcda4by987b1f87963112f9@mail.gmail.com> <20070630120541.GA21339@srcf.ucam.org> <46866C6B.9010801@linux.intel.com> <468687DE.6030003@garzik.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1660 Lines: 40 On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:42:06 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > Matthew Garrett wrote: > >> Do you still get link beat detection when the phy is powered down? > > > does that matter? > > If the interface is down, nic drivers aren't expected to detect link... > > if userspace wants to find link status it should have the interface up. > > > Definitely matters. Switch renegotiation can take a while, and you must > take into account the common case of interface bouncing (immediate down, > then up). > > Hoards actively complained the few times we experimented with this, > because of e.g. DHCP's habit of bouncing the interface, which resulted > in PHY power bouncing, which resulted in negotiation, which resulted in > an excrutiating wait on various broken or stupid switches. > > Overall, this may be classed with other problems of a similar sort: we > can power down a PHY, but that removes hotplug capability and extends > partner/link negotiation time. > > Like SATA, we actually want to support BOTH -- active hotplug and PHY > power-down -- and so this wanders into power management policy. > > Give me a knob, and we can program plenty of ethernet|SATA|USB|... > drivers to power down the PHY and save power. > > Jeff We do have IFF_DORMANT, but almost no driver uses it. And most certainly, the common applications wouldn't know how to use it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/