Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756444AbXF3S5R (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:57:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753723AbXF3S5H (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:57:07 -0400 Received: from mmail.enter.net ([216.193.128.40]:47279 "EHLO mmail.enter.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753901AbXF3S5G convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:57:06 -0400 From: Daniel Hazelton To: Joerg Schilling Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Linux Kernel include files Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:56:47 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: w@1wt.eu, schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, harald@skogtun.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, david@lang.hm References: <46826d62.lTsuVo9cC7wGjcjf%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20070630112309.GA10245@1wt.eu> <46864648.xvPEouG+JEAn31tr%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> In-Reply-To: <46864648.xvPEouG+JEAn31tr%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706301456.48111.dhazelton@enter.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2411 Lines: 55 On Saturday 30 June 2007 08:02:16 Joerg Schilling wrote: > Willy Tarreau wrote: > > J?rg, > > > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:39:57PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:27 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > > > David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > > > By the way, your mailer seems to be sometimes omitting > > > > > > In-Reply-To: and References: headers, which RFC2822 says you > > > > > > SHOULD include in replies. > > > > > > > > > > Sending such accusation without knowing the reason is not polite. > > > > > > > > It's not an accusation -- it's merely an observation. You may not > > > > have noticed that your mailer was misbehaving; now you _do_ know, and > > > > if you care about RFC compliance you might want to fix it. You're not > > > > _obliged_ to fix it, of course. I just thought you'd like to know. > > > > > > Well there you are: my mailer is definitely NOT missbehaving. > > > Please do not repeat similar accusations when not knowing the reason. > > > > Attacking people who suggest to you they *may* have noticed an anomaly is > > not polite at all, childish at best, and counter-productive in any case. > > Well, then please write this to the person who did attack me for no reason! > > What he did is typical trollish behavior, as he tried to turn a technical > based discussion into a flame war for no reason. > > J?rg J?rg - I see no attack. What I do see is a quite friendly notification that your mail program appears to be omitting those headers in certain mails and that such action is in violation of a published standard. Your response was inflammatory, rude and very trollish. And when the person calmly restated himself and the reason he made the original comment you again responded in an extremely unpleasant manner. When notified that your behavior was incorrect you pointed fingers and yelled "He started it!" - something that *CHILDREN* do. Since it appears that you act like a child its time to add you to my killfile again. DRH -- Dialup is like pissing through a pipette. Slow and excruciatingly painful. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/